[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1tzithtlrm.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:13:33 +0200
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Leizhen <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
qiuxishi <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
dingtinahong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>, chenjie6@...wei.com,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: prevent merging between isolated and other pageblocks
On Wed, Mar 23 2016, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Hanjun Guo has reported that a CMA stress test causes broken accounting of
> CMA and free pages:
>
>> Before the test, I got:
>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
>> CmaTotal: 204800 kB
>> CmaFree: 195044 kB
>>
>>
>> After running the test:
>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
>> CmaTotal: 204800 kB
>> CmaFree: 6602584 kB
>>
>> So the freed CMA memory is more than total..
>>
>> Also the the MemFree is more than mem total:
>>
>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo
>> MemTotal: 16342016 kB
>> MemFree: 22367268 kB
>> MemAvailable: 22370528 kB
>
> Laura Abbott has confirmed the issue and suspected the freepage accounting
> rewrite around 3.18/4.0 by Joonsoo Kim. Joonsoo had a theory that this is
> caused by unexpected merging between MIGRATE_ISOLATE and MIGRATE_CMA
> pageblocks:
>
>> CMA isolates MAX_ORDER aligned blocks, but, during the process,
>> partialy isolated block exists. If MAX_ORDER is 11 and
>> pageblock_order is 9, two pageblocks make up MAX_ORDER
>> aligned block and I can think following scenario because pageblock
>> (un)isolation would be done one by one.
>>
>> (each character means one pageblock. 'C', 'I' means MIGRATE_CMA,
>> MIGRATE_ISOLATE, respectively.
>>
>> CC -> IC -> II (Isolation)
>> II -> CI -> CC (Un-isolation)
>>
>> If some pages are freed at this intermediate state such as IC or CI,
>> that page could be merged to the other page that is resident on
>> different type of pageblock and it will cause wrong freepage count.
>
> This was supposed to be prevented by CMA operating on MAX_ORDER blocks, but
> since it doesn't hold the zone->lock between pageblocks, a race window does
> exist.
>
> It's also likely that unexpected merging can occur between MIGRATE_ISOLATE
> and non-CMA pageblocks. This should be prevented in __free_one_page() since
> commit 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated
> pageblock"). However, we only check the migratetype of the pageblock where
> buddy merging has been initiated, not the migratetype of the buddy pageblock
> (or group of pageblocks) which can be MIGRATE_ISOLATE.
>
> Joonsoo has suggested checking for buddy migratetype as part of
> page_is_buddy(), but that would add extra checks in allocator hotpath and
> bloat-o-meter has shown significant code bloat (the function is inline).
>
> This patch reduces the bloat at some expense of more complicated code. The
> buddy-merging while-loop in __free_one_page() is initially bounded to
> pageblock_border and without any migratetype checks. The checks are placed
> outside, bumping the max_order if merging is allowed, and returning to the
> while-loop with a statement which can't be possibly considered harmful.
>
> This fixes the accounting bug and also removes the arguably weird state in the
> original commit 3c605096d315 where buddies could be left unmerged.
>
> Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock")
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/2/280
> Reported-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
> Debugged-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
> Debugged-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.18+
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
I wonder if with this change,
ret = start_isolate_page_range(pfn_max_align_down(start),
pfn_max_align_up(end), migratetype,
false);
in alloc_contig_range could be loosen up to align to pageblocks instead
of having to use max(pageblock, max_page). It feels that it should be
possible, but on the other hand, I’m not certain how buddy allocator
will behave if a max_order page spans MIGRATE_CMA and MIGRATE_ISOLATE
pageblocks. I guess start_isolate_page_range would have to split such
pages?
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index c46b75d14b6f..b9785af4fae2 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -683,34 +683,28 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
> unsigned long combined_idx;
> unsigned long uninitialized_var(buddy_idx);
> struct page *buddy;
> - unsigned int max_order = MAX_ORDER;
> + unsigned int max_order;
> +
> + max_order = min_t(unsigned int, MAX_ORDER, pageblock_order + 1);
>
> VM_BUG_ON(!zone_is_initialized(zone));
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP, page);
>
> VM_BUG_ON(migratetype == -1);
> - if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)) {
> - /*
> - * We restrict max order of merging to prevent merge
> - * between freepages on isolate pageblock and normal
> - * pageblock. Without this, pageblock isolation
> - * could cause incorrect freepage accounting.
> - */
> - max_order = min_t(unsigned int, MAX_ORDER, pageblock_order + 1);
> - } else {
> + if (likely(!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)))
> __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
> - }
>
> - page_idx = pfn & ((1 << max_order) - 1);
> + page_idx = pfn & ((1 << MAX_ORDER) - 1);
>
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_idx & ((1 << order) - 1), page);
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(bad_range(zone, page), page);
>
> +continue_merging:
> while (order < max_order - 1) {
> buddy_idx = __find_buddy_index(page_idx, order);
> buddy = page + (buddy_idx - page_idx);
> if (!page_is_buddy(page, buddy, order))
> - break;
> + goto done_merging;
> /*
> * Our buddy is free or it is CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC guard page,
> * merge with it and move up one order.
> @@ -727,6 +721,32 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
> page_idx = combined_idx;
> order++;
> }
> + if (max_order < MAX_ORDER) {
> + /* If we are here, it means order is >= pageblock_order.
> + * We want to prevent merge between freepages on isolate
> + * pageblock and normal pageblock. Without this, pageblock
> + * isolation could cause incorrect freepage or CMA accounting.
> + *
> + * We don't want to hit this code for the more frequent
> + * low-order merging.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone))) {
> + int buddy_mt;
> +
> + buddy_idx = __find_buddy_index(page_idx, order);
> + buddy = page + (buddy_idx - page_idx);
> + buddy_mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(buddy);
> +
> + if (migratetype != buddy_mt
> + && (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype) ||
> + is_migrate_isolate(buddy_mt)))
> + goto done_merging;
> + }
> + max_order++;
> + goto continue_merging;
> + }
> +
> +done_merging:
> set_page_order(page, order);
>
> /*
> --
> 2.7.3
>
--
Best regards
ミハウ “𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪86” ナザレヴイツ
«If at first you don’t succeed, give up skydiving»
Powered by blists - more mailing lists