[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5Cisx9xv9hCxzYK2U-MdVCdbVMYGY2y4PVoVReWjwE8=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:14:38 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...e.cz>,
Richard Zhu <Richard.Zhu@...escale.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> I would suspect that most boards specify the reset polarity the wrong
> way around. Fixing this without breaking DT stability is hard. OTOH we
It is not hard if we just revert the buggy commit.
> could just argue that the system description in DT is wrong and needs to
> be fixed.
Sure, this would be a nice thing to do as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists