| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <201603300314.34PbnWqZ%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 03:09:10 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Applied "regulator: axp20x: support AXP809 variant" to the
regulator tree
Hi Mark,
[auto build test WARNING on regulator/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.6-rc1 next-20160329]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mark-Brown/Applied-regulator-axp20x-support-AXP809-variant-to-the-regulator-tree/20160330-005751
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-n0-03300206 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:272:14: error: 'AXP809_LDO_IO0' undeclared here (not in a function)
AXP_DESC_IO(AXP809, LDO_IO0, "ldo_io0", "ips", 700, 3300, 100,
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:41:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_IO'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:272:14: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
AXP_DESC_IO(AXP809, LDO_IO0, "ldo_io0", "ips", 700, 3300, 100,
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:41:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_IO'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:272:14: note: (near initialization for 'axp809_regulators')
AXP_DESC_IO(AXP809, LDO_IO0, "ldo_io0", "ips", 700, 3300, 100,
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:41:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_IO'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:275:14: error: 'AXP809_LDO_IO1' undeclared here (not in a function)
AXP_DESC_IO(AXP809, LDO_IO1, "ldo_io1", "ips", 700, 3300, 100,
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:41:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_IO'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:275:14: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
AXP_DESC_IO(AXP809, LDO_IO1, "ldo_io1", "ips", 700, 3300, 100,
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:41:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_IO'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:275:14: note: (near initialization for 'axp809_regulators')
AXP_DESC_IO(AXP809, LDO_IO1, "ldo_io1", "ips", 700, 3300, 100,
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:41:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_IO'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:278:17: error: 'AXP809_RTC_LDO' undeclared here (not in a function)
AXP_DESC_FIXED(AXP809, RTC_LDO, "rtc_ldo", "ips", 1800),
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:96:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_FIXED'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:278:17: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
AXP_DESC_FIXED(AXP809, RTC_LDO, "rtc_ldo", "ips", 1800),
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:96:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_FIXED'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:278:17: note: (near initialization for 'axp809_regulators')
AXP_DESC_FIXED(AXP809, RTC_LDO, "rtc_ldo", "ips", 1800),
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:96:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_FIXED'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:279:14: error: 'AXP809_SW' undeclared here (not in a function)
AXP_DESC_SW(AXP809, SW, "sw", "swin", AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(6)),
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:82:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_SW'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:279:14: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
AXP_DESC_SW(AXP809, SW, "sw", "swin", AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(6)),
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:82:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_SW'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:279:14: note: (near initialization for 'axp809_regulators')
AXP_DESC_SW(AXP809, SW, "sw", "swin", AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(6)),
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:82:3: note: in definition of macro 'AXP_DESC_SW'
[_family##_##_id] = { \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c: In function 'axp20x_set_dcdc_freq':
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:297:7: error: 'AXP809_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
case AXP809_ID:
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:297:7: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c: In function 'axp20x_set_dcdc_workmode':
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:377:7: error: 'AXP809_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
case AXP809_ID:
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c: In function 'axp20x_regulator_probe':
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:420:7: error: 'AXP809_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
case AXP809_ID:
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:422:17: error: 'AXP809_REG_ID_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
nregulators = AXP809_REG_ID_MAX;
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:422:15: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
nregulators = AXP809_REG_ID_MAX;
^
In file included from include/linux/err.h:4:0,
from drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:16:
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:447:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
^
include/linux/compiler.h:151:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
>> drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:446:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:447:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
^
include/linux/compiler.h:151:42: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
>> drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:446:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:447:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
^
include/linux/compiler.h:162:16: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
______r = !!(cond); \
^
>> drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:446:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:456:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC5LDO)) {
^
include/linux/compiler.h:151:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:455:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC5LDO) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:456:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC5LDO)) {
^
include/linux/compiler.h:151:42: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:455:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC5LDO) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:456:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC5LDO)) {
^
include/linux/compiler.h:162:16: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
______r = !!(cond); \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:455:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC5LDO) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:485:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC1))
^
include/linux/compiler.h:151:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:484:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC1) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:485:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC1))
^
include/linux/compiler.h:151:42: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:484:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC1) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:485:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC1))
^
include/linux/compiler.h:162:16: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
______r = !!(cond); \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:484:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC1) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:491:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC5))
^
include/linux/compiler.h:151:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:490:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC5) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:491:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC5))
^
include/linux/compiler.h:151:42: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:490:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC5) ||
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:491:45: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
(regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC5))
^
include/linux/compiler.h:162:16: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
______r = !!(cond); \
^
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c:490:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC5) ||
^
vim +/if +446 drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
430 /* This only sets the dcdc freq. Ignore any errors */
431 axp20x_regulator_parse_dt(pdev);
432
433 for (i = 0; i < nregulators; i++) {
434 const struct regulator_desc *desc = ®ulators[i];
435 struct regulator_desc *new_desc;
436
437 /*
438 * Regulators DC1SW and DC5LDO are connected internally,
439 * so we have to handle their supply names separately.
440 *
441 * We always register the regulators in proper sequence,
442 * so the supply names are correctly read. See the last
443 * part of this loop to see where we save the DT defined
444 * name.
445 */
> 446 if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
447 (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
448 new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*desc),
449 GFP_KERNEL);
450 *new_desc = regulators[i];
451 new_desc->supply_name = dcdc1_name;
452 desc = new_desc;
453 }
454
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/octet-stream" (21692 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists