linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8] acpi, apei, arm64: APEI initial support for aarch64.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADyBb7sCx2ifdbf3JDJ4+CoEEO0L6SdtmCTiKnYsK1uFU42rZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:41:52 +0800
From:	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, len.brown@...el.com,
	pavel@....cz, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Richard Ruigrok <rruigrok@...eaurora.org>,
	"Abdulhamid, Harb" <harba@....qualcomm.com>,
	"Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
	jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
	Jonathan Zhang <jon.zhixiong.zhang@...il.com>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] acpi, apei, arm64: APEI initial support for aarch64.

Hi Will,

On 30 March 2016 at 00:35, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 03:44:18PM +0800, fu.wei@...aro.org wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
>>
>> This commit provides APEI arch-specific bits for aarch64
>>
>> Meanwhile,
>> (1)add a new subfunction "hest_ia32_init" for
>> "acpi_disable_cmcff" which is used by IA-32 Architecture
>> Corrected Machine Check (CMC).
>> (2)move HEST type (ACPI_HEST_TYPE_IA32_CORRECTED_CHECK) checking to
>> a generic place.
>> (3)select EFI when ACPI_APEI is set on ARM64,
>> because arch_apei_get_mem_attribute is using efi_mem_attributes on ARM64.
>>
>> [Fu Wei: improve && upstream]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
>> Tested-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
>> Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v8: Fix a "undefined reference" bug by selecting EFI when ACPI_APEI is set
>>     on ARM64.
>>
>> v7: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/17/183
>>     Add comment for arch_apei_flush_tlb_one in arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
>>
>> v6: https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-acpi/2016-March/006644.html
>>     Move HEST type (ACPI_HEST_TYPE_IA32_CORRECTED_CHECK) checking to
>>     a generic place.
>>     Delete HAVE_ACPI_APEI_HEST_IA32.
>>
>> v5: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/131
>>     Add "HAVE_ACPI_APEI_HEST_IA32" instead of
>>     "#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)".
>>
>> v4: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/8/188
>>     Rebase to latest kernel version(4.4-rc4).
>>     Move arch_apei_flush_tlb_one into header file as a inline function
>>     Add a new subfunction "hest_ia_init" for "acpi_disable_cmcff".
>>
>> v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/3/521
>>     Remove "acpi_disable_cmcff" from arm64 code,
>>     and wrap it in hest.c by "#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)"
>>
>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/2/432
>>     Rebase to latest kernel version(4.4-rc3).
>>     Move arch_apei_flush_tlb_one() to arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>>
>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/14/199
>>     Move arch_apei_flush_tlb_one() to arch/arm64/include/asm/apci.h.
>>     Delete arch/arm64/kernel/apei.c.
>>     Add "#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI" for "acpi_disable_cmcff".
>>
>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig            |  1 +
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c   |  3 ---
>>  drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig     |  1 +
>>  drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c      | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>>  5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index 4f43622..08952ec 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config ARM64
>>       select ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED if ACPI
>>       select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI
>>       select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI
>> +     select HAVE_ACPI_APEI if ACPI
>>       select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
>>       select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
>>       select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> index aee323b..4a6c959 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>
>>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>>  #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>> +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>>
>>  /* Macros for consistency checks of the GICC subtable of MADT */
>>  #define ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH        \
>> @@ -110,7 +111,19 @@ static inline const char *acpi_get_enable_method(int cpu)
>>  }
>>
>>  #ifdef       CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
>> +#define acpi_disable_cmcff 1
>>  pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr);
>> -#endif
>>
>> +/*
>> + * This inline function is used in IRQ context (by GHES driver now),
>> + * see ghes_iounmap_irq and ghes_iounmap_nmi in drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c.
>> + * The page mapped is reserved for firmware in kernel. This invalidate TLB
>> + * maintenance should be broadcasted safely to make sure that all the cores
>> + * will do TLB invalidation, then get the right pages.
>> + */
>
> How about:
>
>  /*
>   * Despite its name, this function must still broadcast the TLB
>   * invalidation in order to ensure other CPUs don't up with with junk
>   * entries as a result of speculation. Unusually, its also called in
>   * IRQ context (ghes_iounmap_irq) so if we ever need to use IPIs for
>   * TLB broadcasting, then we're in trouble here.
>   */

Good, thanks for your help

>
> With that,
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

Thanks ! :-)

>
> Will



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021