[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160331080434.GE2099@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:04:34 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Cristina Ciocan <cristina.ciocan@...el.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, irina.tirdea@...el.com,
octavian.purdila@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 06:05:30PM +0300, Cristina Ciocan wrote:
> + PINCTRL_PIN(55, "GPIO_S0_SC[055]"),
> + PINCTRL_PIN(56, "GPIO_S0_SC[056]"),
> + PINCTRL_PIN(57, "GPIO_S0_SC[057]"),
> + PINCTRL_PIN(58, "GPIO_S0_SC[058]"),
> + PINCTRL_PIN(59, "GPIO_S0_SC[059]"),
> + PINCTRL_PIN(60, "GPIO_S0_SC[060]"),
> + PINCTRL_PIN(61, "GPIO_S0_SC[061]"),
You still have these (and all similar [number]) things. IMO this looks
better:
PINCTRL_PIN(55, "GPIO_S0_SC55"),
PINCTRL_PIN(56, "GPIO_S0_SC56"),
PINCTRL_PIN(57, "GPIO_S0_SC57"),
PINCTRL_PIN(58, "GPIO_S0_SC58"),
PINCTRL_PIN(59, "GPIO_S0_SC59"),
PINCTRL_PIN(60, "GPIO_S0_SC60"),
PINCTRL_PIN(61, "GPIO_S0_SC61"),
but I don't really care that much ;-)
My ack still applies to the whole series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists