linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56FE5106.6010607@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:44:22 +0300
From:	Cristina Ciocan <cristina.ciocan@...el.com>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, irina.tirdea@...el.com,
	octavian.purdila@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Add pin control data structures

On 31.03.2016 11:04, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 06:05:30PM +0300, Cristina Ciocan wrote:
>> +	PINCTRL_PIN(55, "GPIO_S0_SC[055]"),
>> +	PINCTRL_PIN(56, "GPIO_S0_SC[056]"),
>> +	PINCTRL_PIN(57, "GPIO_S0_SC[057]"),
>> +	PINCTRL_PIN(58, "GPIO_S0_SC[058]"),
>> +	PINCTRL_PIN(59, "GPIO_S0_SC[059]"),
>> +	PINCTRL_PIN(60, "GPIO_S0_SC[060]"),
>> +	PINCTRL_PIN(61, "GPIO_S0_SC[061]"),
> 
> You still have these (and all similar [number]) things. IMO this looks
> better:
> 
> 	PINCTRL_PIN(55, "GPIO_S0_SC55"),
> 	PINCTRL_PIN(56, "GPIO_S0_SC56"),
> 	PINCTRL_PIN(57, "GPIO_S0_SC57"),
> 	PINCTRL_PIN(58, "GPIO_S0_SC58"),
> 	PINCTRL_PIN(59, "GPIO_S0_SC59"),
> 	PINCTRL_PIN(60, "GPIO_S0_SC60"),
> 	PINCTRL_PIN(61, "GPIO_S0_SC61"),

Will fix in a new patch set, for consistency. Thank you.

> 
> but I don't really care that much ;-)
> 
> My ack still applies to the whole series.
>