[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+vNU2zBCAF8hJfmSa31CyD9XcOCxYWqH9LKRm1S_sunqkgOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:01:58 -0700
From: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat@...esys.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Justin Waters <justin.waters@...esys.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: imx2_wdt: add external reset support via
'ext-reset-output' dt prop
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:09:16PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> The question was if the property name should be ext-reset-output or
>> fsl,ext-reset-output. In my opinion, it should be fsl,ext-reset-output
>> because it is not a generic property. Tim disagrees.
>>
Guenter,
My issue regarding the vendor prefix was not a hard dissagreement but
was more about me understanding the rational behind using vendor
prefixes. In this case the imx2_wdt driver 'is' a vendor specific
driver as its compatible strings are prefixed with 'fsl,' so isn't
'any' property added to devicetree/bindings/watchdog/fsl-imx-wdt.txt
inherently a vendor specific properly already? I assume that is why
the 'big-endian' property isn't 'fsl,big-endian'.
Maybe it's more about if it 'is' marked as a vendor specific property
its much easier to get approval and accepted by a vendor-specific
maintainer?
>> So we have two options: Change the property name to fsl,ext-reset-output,
>> which I would accept, or wait for a devicetree maintainer to make a decision.
>
> Guenter,
>
> I agree with you on this point. Before everyone agrees that this is a
> generic binding, we should have vendor prefix for the property.
>
> Tim,
>
> This is a small change which, IMO, shouldn't hold an useful patch from being
> merged. Care to resend with the suggested change?
>
> Shawn
Shawn,
Sure - I'll rebase and re-submit.
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists