linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: imx2_wdt: add external reset support via 'ext-reset-output' dt prop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:57:14 +0800
From:	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
Cc:	Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat@...esys.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Justin Waters <justin.waters@...esys.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: imx2_wdt: add external reset support
 via 'ext-reset-output' dt prop

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:09:16PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The question was if the property name should be ext-reset-output or
> fsl,ext-reset-output. In my opinion, it should be fsl,ext-reset-output
> because it is not a generic property. Tim disagrees.
> 
> So we have two options: Change the property name to fsl,ext-reset-output,
> which I would accept, or wait for a devicetree maintainer to make a decision.

Guenter,

I agree with you on this point.  Before everyone agrees that this is a
generic binding, we should have vendor prefix for the property.

Tim,

This is a small change which, IMO, shouldn't hold an useful patch from being
merged.  Care to resend with the suggested change?

Shawn