| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:42:53 +0200
From: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@...il.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high
even if in idle
2016-03-31 19:55 GMT+02:00 Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>:
> On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 19:27 +0200, Jörg Otte wrote:
>> 2016-03-31 17:43 GMT+02:00 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>:
>> > On Thursday, March 31, 2016 05:25:18 PM Jörg Otte wrote:
>> > > 2016-03-31 13:42 GMT+02:00 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>:
>> > > > On Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:05:56 AM Jörg Otte wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > [cut]
>> > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Yes, works for me.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > CPUID(7): No-SGX
>> > > > > CPU Avg_MHz Busy% Bzy_MHz TSC_MHz
>> > > > > - 11 0.66 1682 2494
>> > > > > 0 11 0.60 1856 2494
>> > > > > 1 6 0.34 1898 2494
>> > > > > 2 13 0.82 1628 2494
>> > > > > 3 13 0.87 1528 2494
>> > > > > CPU Avg_MHz Busy% Bzy_MHz TSC_MHz
>> > > > > - 6 0.58 963 2494
>> > > > > 0 8 0.83 957 2494
>> > > > > 1 1 0.08 984 2494
>> > > > > 2 10 1.04 975 2494
>> > > > > 3 3 0.35 934 2494
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>> > [cut]
>> >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > No, this patch doesn't help.
>> >
>> > Well, more work to do then.
>> >
>> > I've just noticed a bug in this patch, which is not relevant for
>> > the results,
>> > but below is a new version.
>> >
>> > > CPUID(7): No-SGX
>> > > CPU Avg_MHz Busy% Bzy_MHz TSC_MHz
>> > > - 8 0.32 2507 2495
>> > > 0 13 0.53 2505 2495
>> > > 1 3 0.11 2523 2495
>> > > 2 1 0.06 2555 2495
>> > > 3 15 0.59 2500 2495
>> > > CPU Avg_MHz Busy% Bzy_MHz TSC_MHz
>> > > - 8 0.33 2486 2495
>> > > 0 12 0.50 2482 2495
>> > > 1 5 0.22 2489 2495
>> > > 2 1 0.04 2492 2495
>> > > 3 15 0.59 2487 2495
>> >
>> > Please apply the patch below and take a (1s or so) trace from the
>> > pstate_sample
>> > tracepoint (under /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/power/ on my
>> > systems).
>> >
>> > Then please apply the revert instead of it and take a trace from
>> > that tracepoint
>> > again and send both of the traces to me.
>> >
>> > ---
>> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> > Subject: [PATCH] intel_pstate: Do not set utilization update hook
>> > too early
>> >
>> > The utilization update hook in the intel_pstate driver is set too
>> > early, as it only should be set after the policy has been fully
>> > initialized by the core. That may cause intel_pstate_update_util()
>> > to use incorrect data and put the CPUs into incorrect P-states as
>> > a result.
>> >
>> > To prevent that from happening, make intel_pstate_set_policy() set
>> > the utilization update hook instead of intel_pstate_init_cpu() so
>> > intel_pstate_update_util() only runs when all things have been
>> > initialized as appropriate.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> > @@ -1103,7 +1103,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigne
>> > intel_pstate_sample(cpu, 0);
>> >
>> > cpu->update_util.func = intel_pstate_update_util;
>> > - cpufreq_set_update_util_data(cpunum, &cpu->update_util);
>> >
>> > pr_debug("intel_pstate: controlling: cpu %d\n", cpunum);
>> >
>> > @@ -1122,18 +1121,29 @@ static unsigned int intel_pstate_get(uns
>> > return get_avg_frequency(cpu);
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static void intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(unsigned int cpu)
>> > +{
>> > + cpufreq_set_update_util_data(cpu, &all_cpu_data[cpu]-
>> > >update_util);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(unsigned int cpu)
>> > +{
>> > + cpufreq_set_update_util_data(cpu, NULL);
>> > + synchronize_sched();
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> > {
>> > if (!policy->cpuinfo.max_freq)
>> > return -ENODEV;
>> >
>> > + intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
>> > +
>> > if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE &&
>> > policy->max >= policy->cpuinfo.max_freq) {
>> > pr_debug("intel_pstate: set performance\n");
>> > limits = &performance_limits;
>> > - if (hwp_active)
>> > - intel_pstate_hwp_set(policy->cpus);
>> > - return 0;
>> > + goto out;
>> > }
>> >
>> > pr_debug("intel_pstate: set powersave\n");
>> > @@ -1163,6 +1173,9 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struc
>> > limits->max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits->max_perf_pct),
>> > int_tofp(100));
>> >
>> > + out:
>> > + intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
>> > +
>> > if (hwp_active)
>> > intel_pstate_hwp_set(policy->cpus);
>> >
>> > @@ -1187,8 +1200,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_stop_cpu(struct
>> >
>> > pr_debug("intel_pstate: CPU %d exiting\n", cpu_num);
>> >
>> > - cpufreq_set_update_util_data(cpu_num, NULL);
>> > - synchronize_sched();
>> > + intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(cpu_num);
>> >
>> > if (hwp_active)
>> > return;
>> > @@ -1455,8 +1467,7 @@ out:
>> > get_online_cpus();
>> > for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> > if (all_cpu_data[cpu]) {
>> > - cpufreq_set_update_util_data(cpu, NULL);
>> > - synchronize_sched();
>> > + intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(cpu);
>> > kfree(all_cpu_data[cpu]);
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>>
>> OK, patch is applied.
>> After some configurations and compilations I'm there.
>> Under pstate_sample I see:
>> enable filter format id trigger
>>
>> what to do now ? (never did tracing before)'
>
> # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
> # echo 1 > events/power/pstate_sample/enable
> # echo 1 > events/power/cpu_frequency/enable
> # cat trace
> Send us the trace file.
>
> Also your kernel config doesn't have many modules, Is it a custom
> configuration you do for your system?
>
I compile a minimum kernel for my notebook. The hardware is fix and
will never change. So I don't need thousends of modules to compile.
Kbuild supports this with target "localmodconfig".
In the rare cases where I get new usb-hardware I add a new driver
and compile a new kernel which takes only a minute.
Thanks, Jörg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists