[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FE54DB.5000201@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:00:43 +0300
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
"Thang Q. Nguyen" <tqnguyen@....com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Karicheri, Muralidharan" <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, Phong Vo <pvo@....com>,
Loc Ho <lho@....com>, patches <patches@....com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb:dwc3: pass arch data to xhci-hcd child
On 04/01/2016 01:20 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com> writes:
>>> if of_dma_configure() does what you want, why don't you just stick it in
>>> dwc3-keystone.c and let the driver continue to copy things for now ?
>>> Something like below, perhaps ?
>>>
>>
>> I know (and i have patch to fix that which I'm going to send) that DMA config
>> in dwc3-keystone.c is not correct and we are good till now just
>> because dwc3_keystone is not used for DMA operations directly.
>>
>> Now about xhci and friends:
>> dwc3_keystone *is created* from DT : of_platform_device_create() -> of_platform_device_create_pdata() -> of_dma_configure()
>> |- dwc3 *is created* from DT : of_platform_device_create() -> of_platform_device_create_pdata() -> of_dma_configure()
>> |- [1] *creates* xhci dev manually : DMA configuration copied manually in dwc3_host_init()
>> |- [2] *creates* usb_gadget dev manually: DMA configuration copied manually in usb_add_gadget_udc_release()
>> |- *creates* usb_udc dev manually : not used for DMA operations directly (as I've checked)
>>
>> Now cases [1] & [2] introduces failures, because DMA configuration is not complete for
>> these devices.
>
> right, then we just copy whatever's missing, right ? Until there's a
> generic way of copying these bits, I want to avoid introducing any of_*
> specific methodologies and prefer to have the manual copy.
Sry, I've found no other way (right now) to fix it, except by using of_dma_configure()
which will do all work in DT case (including calling of arch specific callbacks).
[it might be unsafe to just copy archdata, for example, as it might(will for arm)
contain pointers]
>
>> I can confirm that if I fix [1] & [2] as above USB Device/Dual modes will start
>> working on K2E.
Above is for 4.1 kernel
>
> cool, I'd be happy to take both patches ;-)
>
ok. And seems gadget case is fixed already
commit 7ace8fc8219e4cbbfd5b4790390d9a01a2541cdf
Author: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Date: Mon Jul 13 18:10:05 2015 +0900
usb: gadget: udc: core: Fix argument of dma_map_single for IOMMU
The dma_map_single and dma_unmap_single should set "gadget->dev.parent"
instead of "&gadget->dev" in the first argument because the parent has
a udc controller's device pointer.
Otherwise, iommu functions are not called in ARM environment.
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Above actually means that DMA configuration code can be dropped from
usb_add_gadget_udc_release() completely. Right?:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c
index 4151597..e4e70e1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-core.c
@@ -371,12 +371,6 @@ int usb_add_gadget_udc_release(struct device *parent, struct usb_gadget *gadget,
INIT_WORK(&gadget->work, usb_gadget_state_work);
gadget->dev.parent = parent;
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DMA
- dma_set_coherent_mask(&gadget->dev, parent->coherent_dma_mask);
- gadget->dev.dma_parms = parent->dma_parms;
- gadget->dev.dma_mask = parent->dma_mask;
-#endif
-
if (release)
gadget->dev.release = release;
else
--
regards,
-grygorii
Powered by blists - more mailing lists