[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ9ojn1rhbX8v9zJ8srkQWrQzSZZ6BLYiyyQwU3oz5BTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:51:14 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Yong Li <sdliyong@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>,
Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: pca953x: Use correct u16 value for register word write
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Yong Li <sdliyong@...il.com> wrote:
> The current implementation only uses the first byte in val,
> the second byte is always 0. Change it to use cpu_to_le16
> to write the two bytes into the register
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Li <sdliyong@...il.com>
Patch applied to fixes with Phil's review tag.
It is a regression, right?
Should it be tagged for stable?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists