[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160402031615.GA28449@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 21:16:15 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: remove redundant code from self-test functions
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:37:56AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:46:23PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:20:45PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > > - rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);
> > > if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
> >
> > This line is the entire reason it is open coded, I see it being
> > removed, but I don't see how the functionality is maintained?
>
> When tpm_trance_cmd() returns a positive number it is the TPM error code
> that it returns. tpm_pcr_read() does pass through whatever
> tpm_trace_cmd() returns so the above condition should still work as
> expected.
Okay, everything looks fine to me
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists