[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160405094221.GA12672@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:42:21 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: remove redundant code from self-test functions
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:16:15PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:37:56AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:46:23PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:20:45PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > > - rc = be32_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.return_code);
> > > > if (rc == TPM_ERR_DISABLED || rc == TPM_ERR_DEACTIVATED) {
> > >
> > > This line is the entire reason it is open coded, I see it being
> > > removed, but I don't see how the functionality is maintained?
> >
> > When tpm_trance_cmd() returns a positive number it is the TPM error code
> > that it returns. tpm_pcr_read() does pass through whatever
> > tpm_trace_cmd() returns so the above condition should still work as
> > expected.
>
> Okay, everything looks fine to me
I applied this to http://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git in
order to get exposure (tested-by's are always welcome).
> Jason
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists