| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:43:09 -0400
From: Bastien Bastien Philbert <bastienphilbert@...il.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] select_idle_sibling experiments
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Chris Mason <clm@...com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We're porting the fb kernel up to 4.5, and one of our last few out-of-tree
> patches is a hack to try harder to find idle cpus when waking up tasks.
> This helps in pretty much every workload we run, mostly because they all
> get tuned with a similar setup:
>
> 1) find the load where latencies stop being acceptable
> 2) Run the server at just a little less than that
>
> Usually this means our CPUs are just a little bit idle, and a poor
> scheduler decision to place a task on a busy CPU instead of an idle CPU
> ends up impacting our p99 latencies.
>
> Mike helped us with this last year, fixing up wake_wide() to improve
> things. But we still ended up having to go back to the old hack.
>
> I started with a small-ish program to benchmark wakeup latencies. The
> basic idea is a bunch of worker threads who sit around and burn CPU.
> Every once and a while they send a message to a message thread.
>
> The message thread records the time he woke up the worker, and the
> worker records the delta between that time and the time he actually got
> the CPU again. At the end it spits out a latency histogram. The only
> thing we record is the wakeup latency, there's no measurement of 'work
> done' or any of the normal things you'd expect in a benchmark.
>
> It has knobs for cpu think time, and for how long the messenger thread
> waits before replying. Here's how I'm running it with my patch:
>
> ./schbench -c 30000 -s 30000 -m 6 -t 24 -r 30
> Latency percentiles (usec)
> 50.0000th: 50
> 75.0000th: 62
> 90.0000th: 73
> 95.0000th: 79
> *99.0000th: 99
> 99.5000th: 761
> 99.9000th: 10160
> Over=0, min=0, max=14659
>
> This translates to cputime of 30ms, sleep time of 30ms, 6 messenger
> threads, 24 workers per messenger and a run time of 30 seconds. My box
> has two sockets, 24 cores each. Mainline varies a bit, but numbers like
> this are typical:
>
> ./schbench -c 30000 -s 30000 -m 6 -t 24 -r 30
> Latency percentiles (usec)
> 50.0000th: 50
> 75.0000th: 63
> 90.0000th: 76
> 95.0000th: 85
> *99.0000th: 4680
> 99.5000th: 10192
> 99.9000th: 10928
> Over=0, min=0, max=21816
>
> A high p99 in real application performance will block a new kernel for
> us. p99.5 and p99.9 are included just to show how long the tail really
> is.
>
> I've inlined schbench.c below and attached as a .gz file just in case
> exchange manages to munge it.
>
> Now, on to the patch. I pushed some code around and narrowed the
> problem down to select_idle_sibling() We have cores going into and out
> of idle fast enough that even this cut our latencies in half:
>
> static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
> goto next;
>
> for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(sg)) {
> - if (i == target || !idle_cpu(i))
> + if (!idle_cpu(i))
> goto next;
> }
>
> IOW, by the time we get down to for_each_cpu(), the idle_cpu() check
> done at the top of the function is no longer valid.
>
> I tried a few variations on select_idle_sibling() that preserved the
> underlying goal of returning idle cores before idle SMT threads. They
> were all horrible in different ways, and none of them were fast.
>
> The patch below just makes select_idle_sibling pick the first idle
> thread it can find. When I ran it through production workloads here, it
> was faster than the patch we've been carrying around for the last few
> years.
>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 56b7d4b..c41baa6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4974,7 +4974,6 @@ find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
> static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
> {
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> - struct sched_group *sg;
> int i = task_cpu(p);
>
> if (idle_cpu(target))
> @@ -4990,24 +4989,14 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
> * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an elegible idle cpu.
> */
> sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target));
> - for_each_lower_domain(sd) {
> - sg = sd->groups;
> - do {
> - if (!cpumask_intersects(sched_group_cpus(sg),
> - tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
> - goto next;
> -
> - for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(sg)) {
> - if (i == target || !idle_cpu(i))
> - goto next;
> - }
> + if (!sd)
> + goto done;
>
> - target = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_cpus(sg),
> - tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
> + for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), &p->cpus_allowed) {
> + if (cpu_active(i) && idle_cpu(i)) {
> + target = i;
> goto done;
> -next:
> - sg = sg->next;
> - } while (sg != sd->groups);
> + }
> }
> done:
> return target;
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
Here is my concern, do you test this on standard scheduler workloads
or was this just written for Facebook's
internal workloads. I am going to test this later because frankly this
may cause a regression on my system
which has only 4 cores so a idle CPU is probably less common for a
small amount of time. I am wondering
however if Ingo has any complains before I test this to see if it
causes a regression or a bug on my system.
Ingo do you have any thoughts on this or would you like me to just test this?
Bastien
> /*
> * schbench.c
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2016 Facebook
> * Chris Mason <clm@...com>
> *
> * GPLv2, portions copied from the kernel and from Jens Axboe's fio
> *
> * gcc -Wall -O0 -W schbench.c -o schbench -lpthread
> */
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <getopt.h>
> #include <sys/time.h>
> #include <time.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <linux/futex.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
>
> #define PLAT_BITS 8
> #define PLAT_VAL (1 << PLAT_BITS)
> #define PLAT_GROUP_NR 19
> #define PLAT_NR (PLAT_GROUP_NR * PLAT_VAL)
> #define PLAT_LIST_MAX 20
>
> /* -m number of message threads */
> static int message_threads = 2;
> /* -t number of workers per message thread */
> static int worker_threads = 16;
> /* -r seconds */
> static int runtime = 30;
> /* -s usec */
> static int sleeptime = 30000;
> /* -c usec */
> static unsigned long long cputime = 30000;
> /* -a, bool */
> static int autobench = 0;
>
> /* the latency histogram uses this to pitch outliers */
> static unsigned int max_us = 50000;
>
> /* main() sets this to the time when we should all stop doing work */
> static struct timeval global_stop;
>
> /* the message threads flip this to true when they decide runtime is up */
> static unsigned long stopping = 0;
>
>
> /*
> * one stat struct per thread data, when the workers sleep this records the
> * latency between when they are woken up and when they actually get the
> * CPU again. The message threads sum up the stats of all the workers and
> * then bubble them up to main() for printing
> */
> struct stats {
> unsigned int plat[PLAT_NR];
> unsigned int nr_samples;
> unsigned int max;
> unsigned int min;
> unsigned int over;
> };
>
> /* this defines which latency profiles get printed */
> #define PLIST_P99 4
> static double plist[PLAT_LIST_MAX] = { 50.0, 75.0, 90.0, 95.0, 99.0, 99.5, 99.9 };
>
> enum {
> HELP_LONG_OPT = 1,
> };
>
> char *option_string = "am:t:s:c:r:";
> static struct option long_options[] = {
> {"auto", no_argument, 0, 'a'},
> {"message-threads", required_argument, 0, 'm'},
> {"threads", required_argument, 0, 't'},
> {"runtime", required_argument, 0, 'r'},
> {"sleeptime", required_argument, 0, 's'},
> {"cputime", required_argument, 0, 'c'},
> {"help", no_argument, 0, HELP_LONG_OPT},
> {0, 0, 0, 0}
> };
>
> static void print_usage(void)
> {
> fprintf(stderr, "schbench usage:\n"
> "\t-d (--dispatch-threads): number of message threads (def: 2)\n"
> "\t-t (--threads): worker threads per message thread (def: 16)\n"
> "\t-r (--runtime): How long to run before exiting (seconds, def: 30)\n"
> "\t-s (--sleeptime): Message thread latency (usec, def: 10000\n"
> "\t-c (--cputime): How long to think during loop (usec, def: 10000\n"
> );
> exit(1);
> }
>
> static void parse_options(int ac, char **av)
> {
> int c;
>
> while (1) {
> int option_index = 0;
>
> c = getopt_long(ac, av, option_string,
> long_options, &option_index);
>
> if (c == -1)
> break;
>
> switch(c) {
> case 'a':
> autobench = 1;
> break;
> case 's':
> sleeptime = atoi(optarg);
> break;
> case 'c':
> cputime = atoi(optarg);
> break;
> case 'd':
> message_threads = atoi(optarg);
> break;
> case 't':
> worker_threads = atoi(optarg);
> break;
> case 'r':
> runtime = atoi(optarg);
> break;
> case '?':
> case HELP_LONG_OPT:
> print_usage();
> break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> }
>
> if (optind < ac) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Error Extra arguments '%s'\n", av[optind]);
> exit(1);
> }
> }
>
> void tvsub(struct timeval * tdiff, struct timeval * t1, struct timeval * t0)
> {
> tdiff->tv_sec = t1->tv_sec - t0->tv_sec;
> tdiff->tv_usec = t1->tv_usec - t0->tv_usec;
> if (tdiff->tv_usec < 0 && tdiff->tv_sec > 0) {
> tdiff->tv_sec--;
> tdiff->tv_usec += 1000000;
> if (tdiff->tv_usec < 0) {
> fprintf(stderr, "lat_fs: tvsub shows test time ran backwards!\n");
> exit(1);
> }
> }
>
> /* time shouldn't go backwards!!! */
> if (tdiff->tv_usec < 0 || t1->tv_sec < t0->tv_sec) {
> tdiff->tv_sec = 0;
> tdiff->tv_usec = 0;
> }
> }
>
> /*
> * returns the difference between start and stop in usecs. Negative values
> * are turned into 0
> */
> unsigned long long tvdelta(struct timeval *start, struct timeval *stop)
> {
> struct timeval td;
> unsigned long long usecs;
>
> tvsub(&td, stop, start);
> usecs = td.tv_sec;
> usecs *= 1000000;
> usecs += td.tv_usec;
> return (usecs);
> }
>
> /* mr axboe's magic latency histogram */
> static unsigned int plat_val_to_idx(unsigned int val)
> {
> unsigned int msb, error_bits, base, offset;
>
> /* Find MSB starting from bit 0 */
> if (val == 0)
> msb = 0;
> else
> msb = sizeof(val)*8 - __builtin_clz(val) - 1;
>
> /*
> * MSB <= (PLAT_BITS-1), cannot be rounded off. Use
> * all bits of the sample as index
> */
> if (msb <= PLAT_BITS)
> return val;
>
> /* Compute the number of error bits to discard*/
> error_bits = msb - PLAT_BITS;
>
> /* Compute the number of buckets before the group */
> base = (error_bits + 1) << PLAT_BITS;
>
> /*
> * Discard the error bits and apply the mask to find the
> * index for the buckets in the group
> */
> offset = (PLAT_VAL - 1) & (val >> error_bits);
>
> /* Make sure the index does not exceed (array size - 1) */
> return (base + offset) < (PLAT_NR - 1) ?
> (base + offset) : (PLAT_NR - 1);
> }
>
> /*
> * Convert the given index of the bucket array to the value
> * represented by the bucket
> */
> static unsigned int plat_idx_to_val(unsigned int idx)
> {
> unsigned int error_bits, k, base;
>
> if (idx >= PLAT_NR) {
> fprintf(stderr, "idx %u is too large\n", idx);
> exit(1);
> }
>
> /* MSB <= (PLAT_BITS-1), cannot be rounded off. Use
> * all bits of the sample as index */
> if (idx < (PLAT_VAL << 1))
> return idx;
>
> /* Find the group and compute the minimum value of that group */
> error_bits = (idx >> PLAT_BITS) - 1;
> base = 1 << (error_bits + PLAT_BITS);
>
> /* Find its bucket number of the group */
> k = idx % PLAT_VAL;
>
> /* Return the mean of the range of the bucket */
> return base + ((k + 0.5) * (1 << error_bits));
> }
>
>
> static unsigned int calc_percentiles(unsigned int *io_u_plat, unsigned long nr,
> unsigned int **output)
> {
> unsigned long sum = 0;
> unsigned int len, i, j = 0;
> unsigned int oval_len = 0;
> unsigned int *ovals = NULL;
> int is_last;
>
> len = 0;
> while (len < PLAT_LIST_MAX && plist[len] != 0.0)
> len++;
>
> if (!len)
> return 0;
>
> /*
> * Calculate bucket values, note down max and min values
> */
> is_last = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < PLAT_NR && !is_last; i++) {
> sum += io_u_plat[i];
> while (sum >= (plist[j] / 100.0 * nr)) {
> if (j == oval_len) {
> oval_len += 100;
> ovals = realloc(ovals, oval_len * sizeof(unsigned int));
> }
>
> ovals[j] = plat_idx_to_val(i);
> is_last = (j == len - 1);
> if (is_last)
> break;
>
> j++;
> }
> }
>
> *output = ovals;
> return len;
> }
>
> static int calc_p99(struct stats *s)
> {
> unsigned int *ovals = NULL;
> int ret = 0;
> int len;
>
> len = calc_percentiles(s->plat, s->nr_samples, &ovals);
> if (len && len > PLIST_P99)
> ret = ovals[PLIST_P99];
> if (ovals)
> free(ovals);
> return ret;
> }
>
> static void show_latencies(struct stats *s)
> {
> unsigned int *ovals = NULL;
> unsigned int len, i;
>
> len = calc_percentiles(s->plat, s->nr_samples, &ovals);
> if (len) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Latency percentiles (usec)\n");
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> fprintf(stderr, "\t%s%2.4fth: %u\n",
> i == PLIST_P99 ? "*" : "",
> plist[i], ovals[i]);
> }
>
> if (ovals)
> free(ovals);
>
> fprintf(stderr, "\tOver=%u, min=%u, max=%u\n", s->over, s->min, s->max);
> }
>
> /* fold latency info from s into d */
> void combine_stats(struct stats *d, struct stats *s)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < PLAT_NR; i++)
> d->plat[i] += s->plat[i];
> d->nr_samples += s->nr_samples;
> d->over += s->over;
> if (s->max > d->max)
> d->max = s->max;
> if (s->min < d->min)
> d->min = s->min;
> }
>
> /* record a latency result into the histogram */
> static void add_lat(struct stats *s, unsigned int us)
> {
> int lat_index = 0;
>
> if (us > s->max)
> s->max = us;
> if (us < s->min)
> s->min = us;
>
> if (us > max_us) {
> fprintf(stderr, "latency=%u usec\n", us);
> s->over++;
> }
>
> lat_index = plat_val_to_idx(us);
> __sync_fetch_and_add(&s->plat[lat_index], 1);
> __sync_fetch_and_add(&s->nr_samples, 1);
> }
>
> /*
> * every thread has one of these, it comes out to about 19K thanks to the
> * giant stats struct
> */
> struct thread_data {
> pthread_t tid;
> /* ->next is for placing us on the msg_thread's list for waking */
> struct thread_data *next;
>
> /* our parent thread and messaging partner */
> struct thread_data *msg_thread;
>
> /*
> * the msg thread stuffs gtod in here before waking us, so we can
> * measure scheduler latency
> */
> struct timeval wake_time;
>
> /* keep the futex and the wake_time in the same cacheline */
> int futex;
>
> /* mr axboe's magic latency histogram */
> struct stats stats;
> };
>
> /* we're so fancy we make our own futex wrappers */
> #define FUTEX_BLOCKED 0
> #define FUTEX_RUNNING 1
>
> static int futex(int *uaddr, int futex_op, int val,
> const struct timespec *timeout, int *uaddr2, int val3)
> {
> return syscall(SYS_futex, uaddr, futex_op, val, timeout, uaddr2, val3);
> }
>
> /*
> * wakeup a process waiting on a futex, making sure they are really waiting
> * first
> */
> static void fpost(int *futexp)
> {
> int s;
>
> if (__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(futexp, FUTEX_BLOCKED,
> FUTEX_RUNNING)) {
> s = futex(futexp, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL, NULL, 0);
> if (s == -1) {
> perror("FUTEX_WAKE");
> exit(1);
> }
> }
> }
>
> /*
> * wait on a futex, with an optional timeout. Make sure to set
> * the futex to FUTEX_BLOCKED beforehand.
> *
> * This will return zero if all went well, or return -ETIMEDOUT if you
> * hit the timeout without getting posted
> */
> static int fwait(int *futexp, struct timespec *timeout)
> {
> int s;
> while (1) {
> /* Is the futex available? */
> if (__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(futexp, FUTEX_RUNNING,
> FUTEX_BLOCKED)) {
> break; /* Yes */
> }
> /* Futex is not available; wait */
> s = futex(futexp, FUTEX_WAIT, FUTEX_BLOCKED, timeout, NULL, 0);
> if (s == -1 && errno != EAGAIN) {
> if (errno == ETIMEDOUT)
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> perror("futex-FUTEX_WAIT");
> exit(1);
> }
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> * cmpxchg based list prepend
> */
> static void xlist_add(struct thread_data *head, struct thread_data *add)
> {
> struct thread_data *old;
> struct thread_data *ret;
>
> while (1) {
> old = head->next;
> add->next = old;
> ret = __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&head->next, old, add);
> if (ret == old)
> break;
> }
> }
>
> /*
> * xchg based list splicing. This returns the entire list and
> * replaces the head->next with NULL
> */
> static struct thread_data *xlist_splice(struct thread_data *head)
> {
> struct thread_data *old;
> struct thread_data *ret;
>
> while (1) {
> old = head->next;
> ret = __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&head->next, old, NULL);
> if (ret == old)
> break;
> }
> return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> * Wake everyone currently waiting on the message list, filling in their
> * thread_data->wake_time with the current time.
> *
> * It's not exactly the current time, it's really the time at the start of
> * the list run. We want to detect when the scheduler is just preempting the
> * waker and giving away the rest of its timeslice. So we gtod once at
> * the start of the loop and use that for all the threads we wake.
> */
> static void xlist_wake_all(struct thread_data *td)
> {
> struct thread_data *list;
> struct thread_data *next;
> struct timeval now;
>
> list = xlist_splice(td);
> gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
> while (list) {
> next = list->next;
> list->next = NULL;
> memcpy(&list->wake_time, &now, sizeof(now));
> fpost(&list->futex);
> list = next;
> }
> }
>
> /*
> * called by worker threads to send a message and wait for the answer.
> * In reality we're just trading one cacheline with the gtod and futex in
> * it, but that's good enough. We gtod after waking and use that to
> * record scheduler latency.
> */
> static void msg_and_wait(struct thread_data *td)
> {
> struct timeval now;
> unsigned long long delta;
> struct timespec timeout;
>
> timeout.tv_sec = 0;
> timeout.tv_nsec = 5000 * 1000;
>
> /* set ourselves to blocked */
> td->futex = FUTEX_BLOCKED;
> gettimeofday(&td->wake_time, NULL);
>
> /* add us to the list */
> xlist_add(td->msg_thread, td);
>
> fpost(&td->msg_thread->futex);
>
> /*
> * don't wait if the main threads are shutting down,
> * they will never kick us fpost has a full barrier, so as long
> * as the message thread walks his list after setting stopping,
> * we shouldn't miss the wakeup
> */
> if (!stopping) {
> /* if he hasn't already woken us up, wait */
> fwait(&td->futex, NULL);
> }
>
> gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
> delta = tvdelta(&td->wake_time, &now);
> if (delta > 0)
> add_lat(&td->stats, delta);
> }
>
> /*
> * once the message thread starts all his children, this is where he
> * loops until our runtime is up. Basically this sits around waiting
> * for posting by the worker threads, replying to their messages after
> * a delay of 'sleeptime' + some jitter.
> */
> static void run_msg_thread(struct thread_data *td)
> {
> struct timeval now;
> struct timespec timeout;
> unsigned int seed = pthread_self();
> int max_jitter = sleeptime / 4;
> int jitter;
>
> jitter = rand_r(&seed) % max_jitter;
> timeout.tv_sec = 0;
> timeout.tv_nsec = (sleeptime + jitter) * 1000;
>
> while (1) {
> td->futex = FUTEX_BLOCKED;
> xlist_wake_all(td);
>
> gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
> if (now.tv_sec > global_stop.tv_sec) {
> stopping = 1;
> __sync_synchronize();
> xlist_wake_all(td);
> break;
> }
> fwait(&td->futex, &timeout);
>
> /*
> * messages shouldn't be instant, sleep a little to make them
> * wait
> */
> jitter = rand_r(&seed) % max_jitter;
> usleep(sleeptime + jitter);
> }
> }
>
> #define nop __asm__ __volatile__("rep;nop": : :"memory")
>
> static void usec_spin(unsigned long spin_time)
> {
> struct timeval now;
> struct timeval start;
> unsigned long long delta;
>
> gettimeofday(&start, NULL);
> while (1) {
> gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
> delta = tvdelta(&start, &now);
> if (delta > spin_time)
> return;
> nop;
> }
> }
>
> /*
> * the worker thread is pretty simple, it just does a single spin and
> * then waits on a message from the message thread
> */
> void *worker_thread(void *arg)
> {
> struct thread_data *td = arg;
>
> while(1) {
> if (stopping)
> break;
>
> usec_spin(cputime);
> msg_and_wait(td);
> }
> return NULL;
> }
>
> /*
> * the message thread starts his own gaggle of workers and then sits around
> * replying when they post him. He collects latency stats as all the threads
> * exit
> */
> void *message_thread(void *arg)
> {
> struct thread_data *td = arg;
> struct thread_data *worker_threads_mem = NULL;
> int i;
> int ret;
>
> worker_threads_mem = calloc(worker_threads, sizeof(struct thread_data));
>
> if (!worker_threads_mem) {
> perror("unable to allocate ram");
> pthread_exit((void *)-ENOMEM);
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < worker_threads; i++) {
> pthread_t tid;
>
> worker_threads_mem[i].msg_thread = td;
> ret = pthread_create(&tid, NULL, worker_thread,
> worker_threads_mem + i);
> if (ret) {
> fprintf(stderr, "error %d from pthread_create\n", ret);
> exit(1);
> }
> worker_threads_mem[i].tid = tid;
> }
>
> run_msg_thread(td);
>
> for (i = 0; i < worker_threads; i++) {
> pthread_join(worker_threads_mem[i].tid, NULL);
> combine_stats(&td->stats, &worker_threads_mem[i].stats);
> }
> free(worker_threads_mem);
>
> return NULL;
> }
>
> int main(int ac, char **av)
> {
> int i;
> int ret;
> struct thread_data *message_threads_mem = NULL;
> struct stats stats;
>
> parse_options(ac, av);
> again:
> stopping = 0;
> memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats));
>
> message_threads_mem = calloc(message_threads,
> sizeof(struct thread_data));
>
>
> if (!message_threads_mem) {
> perror("unable to allocate ram");
> exit(1);
> }
> gettimeofday(&global_stop, NULL);
> global_stop.tv_sec += runtime;
>
> /* start our message threads, each one starts its own workers */
> for (i = 0; i < message_threads; i++) {
> pthread_t tid;
> ret = pthread_create(&tid, NULL, message_thread,
> message_threads_mem + i);
> if (ret) {
> fprintf(stderr, "error %d from pthread_create\n", ret);
> exit(1);
> }
> message_threads_mem[i].tid = tid;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < message_threads; i++) {
> pthread_join(message_threads_mem[i].tid, NULL);
> combine_stats(&stats, &message_threads_mem[i].stats);
> }
>
> free(message_threads_mem);
>
> /*
> * in auto bench mode, keep adding workers until our latencies get
> * horrible
> */
> if (autobench) {
> int p99 = calc_p99(&stats);
> fprintf(stderr, "cputime %Lu threads %d p99 %d\n",
> cputime, worker_threads, p99);
> if (p99 < 2000) {
> worker_threads++;
> goto again;
> }
> }
>
> show_latencies(&stats);
>
> return 0;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists