lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160406150206.GB24283@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:02:06 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Frank Mehnert <frank.mehnert@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: PG_reserved and compound pages

[CCing linux-mm mailing list]

On Wed 06-04-16 13:28:37, Frank Mehnert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Linux 4.5 introduced additional checks to ensure that compound pages are
> never marked as reserved. In our code we use PG_reserved to ensure that
> the kernel does never swap out such pages, e.g.

Are you putting your pages on the LRU list? If not how they could get
swapped out?

> 
>   int i;
>   struct page *pages = alloc_pages(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_COMP, 4);
>   for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
>     SetPageReserved(&pages[i]);
> 
> The purpose of setting PG_reserved is to prevent the kernel from swapping
> this memory out. This worked with older kernel but not with Linux 4.5 as
> setting PG_reserved to compound pages is not allowed any more.
> 
> Can somebody explain how we can achieve the same result in accordance to
> the new Linux 4.5 rules?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Frank
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ