[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160407004958.GA27130@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 02:49:58 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>,
Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>,
Emrah Demir <ed@...sec.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prefer kASLR over Hibernation
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> [...]
>
> One of the weak points is the final jump, because it has to be done to the
> physical location of the image kernel's entry point even though the virtual
> addresses of it may differ between the boot and the image kernels. The seed is
> not needed for that, only the physical address of the entry point. The boot
> kernel doesn't have it today, though, because the virtual address of that is
> passed in the image header. That should not be too difficult to change, however.
I didn't realize we jumped to the image kernel as well - I (wrongly) assumed we
kept the bootup kernel. That should indeed make hibernation mostly
kASLR-invariant.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists