linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/20] mfd: Add devm_ apis for mfd_add_devices and mfd_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57063A12.4080200@nvidia.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:14:34 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	<corbet@....net>, <andreas.werner@....de>, <tony@...mide.com>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] mfd: Add devm_ apis for mfd_add_devices and mfd_release_devices

Hi Lee,
Thanks for review.
I will send another patch with incorporating your comments.


On Thursday 07 April 2016 04:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		*ptr = dev;
> +		devres_add(dev, ptr);
> +	} else {
> +		devres_free(ptr);
> +	}
> Switch these round.  If you encounter a problem, free and return.  If
> not, skip the error handling and add the device outside of the if().

Like below?

if (ret) {
      devres_free(ptr);
      return ret;
}

*ptr = dev;
devres_add(dev, ptr);

return ret;

>> + * Remove all mfd devices added on the device.
> s/mfd/MFD/
>
> 'D' already means devices, so here you are saying "devices devices".
> Please re-word.  Besides, you need to be more specific as to which
> "devices on the devices" you are detailing, since this sentence
> doesn't really make a great deal of sense.
Wanted to say
Remove all devices added by mfd_add_devices()  from parent device.


>> + * Normally this function will not need to be called and the resource
>> + * management code will ensure that the resource is freed.
> Then what is the purpose of providing it?  Do you have a user?

To have pair of release. I have not seen the usage of most of 
devm_*_release() function other than devm_kfree().