linux-kernel - Re: sched: horrible way to detect whether a task has been preempted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:05:28 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:	Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
cc:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>
Subject: Re: sched: horrible way to detect whether a task has been
 preempted

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:

> > Alternatively, without eating up a TIF_ space, it'd be possible to push a
> > magic contents on top of the stack in preempt_schedule_irq() (and pop it
> > once we are returning from there), and if such magic value is detected, we
> > just don't bother and claim unreliability.
> 
> Ah, but wouldn't we still have to walk through the frames (i.e. enter
> the loop in patch 7/14) to look for the magic value in this approach?

The idea was that it'd be located at a place to which saved stack pointer 
of the sleeping task is pointing to (or at a fixed offset from it).

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs