linux-kernel - Re: Kernel stability on baytrail machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:14:17 +0100
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Michal Feix <michal@...x.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel stability on baytrail machines

> > I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently
> > underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how much current linux
> > kernel is supposed to be stable on general baytrail machines?  
> 
> If you did not get any replies... you might want to check MAINTAINERS file, and
> put Intel x86 maintainers on Cc list.
> 
> I'm sure someone cares :-).

Yes we care, and there are people looking at the various reports.

Alan