[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160712194158.GA4834@laptop>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:41:58 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Michal Feix <michal@...x.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Kernel stability on baytrail machines
Hi Alan,
(Adding interested people to this thread)
On 09 Apr 08:14 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > > I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently
> > > underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how much current linux
> > > kernel is supposed to be stable on general baytrail machines?
> >
> > If you did not get any replies... you might want to check MAINTAINERS file, and
> > put Intel x86 maintainers on Cc list.
> >
> > I'm sure someone cares :-).
>
> Yes we care, and there are people looking at the various reports.
>
Are there any updates on the status of this issue?
The current bugzilla report [1] marks this as a power management
issue. However, many reports indicate that it would only freeze
when running X, so it's not completely clear if it's related to
the gfx driver too.
Also, do we know which CPUs are affect by this issue?
and which are NOT affected :) - would be quite relevant
in picking a CPU for a product.
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051
--
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists