linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 5/5 v4] ASoC: dwc: Update DOCUMENTATION for I2S Driver

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <570B6D66.4080309@synopsys.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:24:54 +0100
From:	Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
	<Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
	<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 5/5 v4] ASoC: dwc: Update DOCUMENTATION for
 I2S Driver

Hi Lars,

On 09-04-2016 15:55, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 06:08 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>>
>> On 08-04-2016 16:52, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>> On 04/08/2016 12:06 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07-04-2016 18:53, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> + Optional properties:
>>>>>> + - snps,use-dmaengine: If set the driver will use ALSA DMA engine. If set
>>>>>> +   it is required to use the properties 'dmas' and 'dma-names'.
>>>>> This is not a good interface, it's describing Linux internal APIs.  If
>>>>> the device needs to operate in PIO mode it should just do that.
>>>> I added this interface because there is no direct way to check if DMA is
>>>> available on the I2S controller so it is not possible to automatically change
>>>> between DMA and PIO mode. As the I2S controller can be built with or without DMA
>>>> support it is necessary to somehow check if DMA is enabled or not and according
>>>> to that use either ALSA DMA engine or the custom platform driver sent in these
>>>> patches. I did not want to remove drivers functionality so I added this property
>>>> to the DT. This way a user can select between DMA and PIO mode.
>>> That's OK, but you need to describe the hardware, not the indented behavior
>>> of the software driver.
>>>
>> Is this okay: "snps,use-dmaengine: Set this boolean paramater if I2S controller
>> has DMA support. If set the properties 'dmas' and 'dma-names' must be also set" ?
> The description is better. But the name of the property is still imperative
> rather then descriptive. It tells the software what should be done rather
> then describing what the hardware looks like.
>
> Since there is already the dmas property which is present if a DMA is
> connected and is absent when no DMA is present it should be enough to just
> check that property rather than requiring an additional one.

Ok, will then use the DMA property to decide which mode to use: PIO or DMA.

>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives