[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <570B9DB9.8050807@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:51:05 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
CC: <tony@...mide.com>, <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>, <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
<jun.li@...escale.com>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>, <nsekhar@...com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] usb: dwc3: omap: Make the wrapper interrupt
shared
On 11/04/16 15:13, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> writes:
>> The wrapper interrupt is shared with OTG core so mark it IRQF_SHARED.
>>
>> Use request_threaded_irq() to ensure that irqflags match for the
>> shared interrupt handlers. If we don't use request_treaded_irq() then
>> forced threaded irq will set IRQF_ONESHOT and this won't match with
>> the OTG irq handler.
>
> then it seems you need to _first_ fix the OTG IRQ handler. Why does it
There is no OTG irq handler yet.
> defer ? At a minimum, first switch to threaded IRQ handler, then (in
> another patch) switch to IRQF_SHARED
OK.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c | 12 +++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
>> index 22e9606..51ca098 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
>> @@ -274,19 +274,25 @@ static irqreturn_t dwc3_omap_interrupt(int irq, void *_omap)
>> {
>> struct dwc3_omap *omap = _omap;
>> u32 reg;
>> + int ret = IRQ_NONE;
>>
>> reg = dwc3_omap_read_irqmisc_status(omap);
>>
>> + if (reg)
>> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> you can avoid the local variable by returning early here.
How can we return early? we need to check irq0_status as well right?
>
> if (!reg)
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
>> if (reg & USBOTGSS_IRQMISC_DMADISABLECLR)
>> omap->dma_status = false;
>>
>> dwc3_omap_write_irqmisc_status(omap, reg);
>>
>> reg = dwc3_omap_read_irq0_status(omap);
>> + if (reg)
>> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> and this check is probably unnecessary.
>
>> @@ -506,8 +512,8 @@ static int dwc3_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> reg = dwc3_omap_readl(omap->base, USBOTGSS_SYSCONFIG);
>> omap->dma_status = !!(reg & USBOTGSS_SYSCONFIG_DMADISABLE);
>>
>> - ret = devm_request_irq(dev, omap->irq, dwc3_omap_interrupt, 0,
>> - "dwc3-omap", omap);
>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, omap->irq, dwc3_omap_interrupt,
>
> this switch to threaded IRQ is not part of $subject.
>
OK.
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists