linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iHWvp1UvLx1X=MozD0EZ7+L2h7aJYKm6WGBYO0FzGj7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:34:01 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>
>> > Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
>> > the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
>> > hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
>> > drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
>> > function can just create the instance of it on its own and
>> > bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
>> >
>> > This renames device_add_property_set() to
>> > device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
>> > property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
>> > property_set.
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c      | 12 ++++--------
>
> Daniel, I think we just need your ACK for this one.
>
> Otherwise I think we are covered.
>
>> >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c |  6 +-----
>> >  drivers/base/platform.c           | 19 ++++++++++---------
>> >  drivers/base/property.c           | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c     | 12 ++----------
>> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c      | 20 ++++----------------
>> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c          |  2 +-
>> >  drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h          |  4 ++--
>> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c            |  4 ++--
>> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h          |  4 ++--
>> >  include/linux/platform_device.h   |  6 +++---
>> >  include/linux/property.h          | 15 +++------------
>> >  12 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>>
>> What's happening with this patch?  I believe we're still missing
>> Acks.  Once they are collected someone needs to create an immutable
>> branch and send out a pull-request.
>
> Rafael, have you had time to take a look at this?

Yes, it's in my bleeding-edge branch now.  I'm planning to move it to
linux-next this week

Thanks,
Rafael