[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160411195557.GA6426@kozik-lap>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:55:57 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
kgene@...nel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, tomasz.figa@...il.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux.amoon@...il.com,
m.reichl@...etechno.de, tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de,
inki.dae@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/20] PM / devferq: Add generic exynos bus frequency
driver and new passive governor
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:01:18PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Dear Myungjoo and Krzysztof,
>
> This patch-set already get the acked-by or signed-off-by tag
> from Exynos SoC and DEVFREQ maintainer except for patch10.
>
> If there is no comment, could you pick this patch-set?
I cannot find any description of dependencies between the patches so I
assume the obvious one: DTS patches do not depend on anything. This
means that:
1. driver/devfreq related changes (including dt-bindings documentation)
go to Myungjoo,
2. I can pick DTS changes.
But first I would like to see the bindings documentation beeing applied
by someone as a proof that there won't be more development in DTS in
these series. There is no sense of picking DTS if after comments from
Rob, you will rework them, right?
Anyway I see Rob's questions. For these bindings I think you should get
DT-guys ack first.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists