linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/20] PM / devferq: Add generic exynos bus frequency driver and new passive governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGTfZH3AVbo6w9KDVNNCs+JMi=+-CA0oL6pQ+3jcOFihtKaK3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2016 05:15:01 +0900
From:	Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
	Markus Reichl <m.reichl@...etechno.de>,
	Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>,
	"inki.dae@...sung.com" <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/20] PM / devferq: Add generic exynos bus frequency
 driver and new passive governor

Hi Krzysztof,

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:01:18PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Dear Myungjoo and Krzysztof,
>>
>> This patch-set already get the acked-by or signed-off-by tag
>> from Exynos SoC and DEVFREQ maintainer except for patch10.
>>
>> If there is no comment, could you pick this patch-set?
>
> I cannot find any description of dependencies between the patches so I
> assume the obvious one: DTS patches do not depend on anything. This
> means that:
> 1. driver/devfreq related changes (including dt-bindings documentation)
>    go to Myungjoo,
> 2. I can pick DTS changes.

Yes.

>
> But first I would like to see the bindings documentation beeing applied
> by someone as a proof that there won't be more development in DTS in
> these series. There is no sense of picking DTS if after comments from
> Rob, you will rework them, right?

I already discussed the Rob's question on December, last year on
patchset[1]. But, after that, I didn't receive the any reply from him.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/943

So, I thought that there is no comment.  But, today, he give some
question after 4 months.

But I'll again reply to Rob's question.

>
> Anyway I see Rob's questions. For these bindings I think you should get
> DT-guys ack first.

OK.

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi