[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160413084037.GG18516@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:40:38 +0100
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
pjt@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, juri.lelli@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Drop out incomplete current period when
sched averages accrue
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:14:48AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:02:58PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > On 10/04/16 23:36, Yuyang Du wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > @@ -2704,11 +2694,14 @@ static __always_inline int
> > > __update_load_avg(u64 now, int cpu, struct sched_avg *sa,
> > > unsigned long weight, int running, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > {
> > > - u64 delta, scaled_delta, periods;
> > > - u32 contrib;
> > > - unsigned int delta_w, scaled_delta_w, decayed = 0;
> > > + u64 delta;
> > > + u32 contrib, periods;
> > > unsigned long scale_freq, scale_cpu;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * now rolls down to a period boundary
> > > + */
> > > + now = now && (u64)(~0xFFFFF);
> >
> > This forces now to be 1.
> >
> > s/&&/&
>
> Duh, :)
Have you, or anybody else, actually tested the impact of this patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists