[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <570E1562.8050906@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:46:10 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/clock: Make local_clock/cpu_clock inline
On 04/13/2016 11:41 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> The local_clock/cpu_clock functions were changed to prevent a double
>> identical test with sched_clock_cpu() when HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
>> is set. That resulted in one line functions.
>>
>> As these functions are in all the cases one line functions and in the
>> hot path, it is useful to specify them as static inline in order to
>> give a strong hint to the compiler.
>>
>> After verification, it appears the compiler does not inline them
>> without this hint. Change those functions to static inline.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/sched.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> kernel/sched/clock.c | 41 -----------------------------------------
>> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> Hm, this does not seem to apply to v4.6-rc3 cleanly.
Actually I based the patches on top of tip/sched/core.
Shall I rebase them against v4.6-rc3 ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists