[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5711143B.1020700@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:18:03 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 04/15] coresight: tmc: introducing new header file
On 15/04/16 17:15, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 15 April 2016 at 10:08, Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com> wrote:
>> On 15/04/16 17:03, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> I agree. But the patch which introduces the definition doesn't deal with
>> TMC_STS_ at all either.
>
> Patch 13/15 is using the TMC_STS_FULL define on line 147. Am I
> missing your point?
Ah, sorry, didn't see that TMC_STS_FULL was used there. Ignore my comments.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists