lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:09:00 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	xfs@....sgi.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: xfs: compiler implementation dependent behavior?

The value stored in *cycle in xlog_crack_grant_head_val
in xfs_log_priv.h is compiler implementation dependent.

Does it matter?

static inline void
xlog_crack_grant_head_val(int64_t val, int *cycle, int *space)
{
	*cycle = val >> 32;
	*space = val & 0xffffffff;
}


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ