[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1inzipp5w.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:55:55 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [-next] BUG_ON in scsi_target_destroy()
>>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
James> The STARGET_REMOVE state you added only applies to the case we're
James> trying to kill a target. In the natural operation case, which is
James> what everyone else is running into, we will try to remove a
James> running target when it has no more scsi devices left on it. So
James> the correct patch should be to make the BUG_ON see this:
Commit amended.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists