linux-kernel - Re: [Question] refcount of DT node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 Apr 2016 00:02:54 +0900
From:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	rank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Question] refcount of DT node

Hi experts.


2016-04-15 3:38 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>:

>
> Their stance is not something I agree with - if we have something,
> it should be correct, even if it's not what we would ultimately
> desire, _or_ it should be removed.  This half-way house that we
> have today is total madness to me.

I agree with Russell here.

I am comfortable to do my best in the given API at this point
(and also happy to adjust my drivers when a new API is supported in the future).

So, the answers from DT people are really helpful for me to write correct code.

Thank you everyone!



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada