linux-kernel - Re: Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
	rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h

----- On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Frederic Weisbecker fweisbec@...il.com wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> Hello, Frederic,
>> 
>> One thing that I have had on my list for some time is to rearrange the
>> RCU source code to make it easier to find things.  Given our discussion
>> yesterday, this seemed like a good time to take that step with the
>> expedited grace-period code.  I have a couple of commits doing this in
>> -rcu, and would like your opinion.  Worthwhile, or should I revert those
>> two commits?
> 
> It's definetly worth having a look! And it might help me eventually understand
> that expedited grace period thing :-)

Moving the expedited handling into its own files indeed
seems to better organize the sub-parts of RCU. That seems
like a good idea.

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com