[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1460836099.19090.82.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:48:19 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Whine about ACCESS_ONCE
On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 12:04 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Add a test for use of ACCESS_ONCE that could be written using
> READ_ONCE or WRITE_ONCE.
>
> --fix it too if desired.
And here's a simple coccinelle script that does a
rather better job:
$ cat access_once.cocci
@@
expression e1;
expression e2;
@@
- ACCESS_ONCE(e1) = e2
+ WRITE_ONCE(e1, e2)
@@
expression e1;
@@
- ACCESS_ONCE(e1)
+ READ_ONCE(e1)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists