[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160418022956.GB32090@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:29:56 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, stern@...land.harvard.edu
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
peter.chen@...escale.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
jun.li@...escale.com, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
tony@...mide.com, Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com, abrestic@...omium.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/12] usb: hcd: Initialize hcd->flags to 0
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:32:22AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 06/04/16 09:09, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> writes:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> >> index 2ca2cef..6b1930d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
> >> @@ -2706,6 +2706,7 @@ int usb_add_hcd(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
> >> int retval;
> >> struct usb_device *rhdev;
> >>
> >> + hcd->flags = 0;
> >
> > seems like this would make more sense in usb_del_hcd() instead.
> >
>
> OK, I'll move it there.
>
It depends on Alan's comments, whether only usb_add_hcd/usb_del_hcd
pair can be called repeat. If Alan acks it, I have no idea for it.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists