lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160418022511.091381711@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:28:40 +0900
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 058/137] farsync: fix off-by-one bug in fst_add_one

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

[ Upstream commit e725a66c0202b5f36c2f9d59d26a65c53bbf21f7 ]

gcc-6 finds an out of bounds access in the fst_add_one function
when calculating the end of the mmio area:

drivers/net/wan/farsync.c: In function 'fst_add_one':
drivers/net/wan/farsync.c:418:53: error: index 2 denotes an offset greater than size of 'u8[2][8192] {aka unsigned char[2][8192]}' [-Werror=array-bounds]
 #define BUF_OFFSET(X)   (BFM_BASE + offsetof(struct buf_window, X))
                                                     ^
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:158:21: note: in definition of macro '__compiler_offsetof'
  __builtin_offsetof(a, b)
                     ^
drivers/net/wan/farsync.c:418:37: note: in expansion of macro 'offsetof'
 #define BUF_OFFSET(X)   (BFM_BASE + offsetof(struct buf_window, X))
                                     ^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wan/farsync.c:2519:36: note: in expansion of macro 'BUF_OFFSET'
                                  + BUF_OFFSET ( txBuffer[i][NUM_TX_BUFFER][0]);
                                    ^~~~~~~~~~

The warning is correct, but not critical because this appears
to be a write-only variable that is set by each WAN driver but
never accessed afterwards.

I'm taking the minimal fix here, using the correct pointer by
pointing 'mem_end' to the last byte inside of the register area
as all other WAN drivers do, rather than the first byte outside of
it. An alternative would be to just remove the mem_end member
entirely.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/wan/farsync.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
@@ -2516,7 +2516,7 @@ fst_add_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
                 dev->mem_start   = card->phys_mem
                                  + BUF_OFFSET ( txBuffer[i][0][0]);
                 dev->mem_end     = card->phys_mem
-                                 + BUF_OFFSET ( txBuffer[i][NUM_TX_BUFFER][0]);
+                                 + BUF_OFFSET ( txBuffer[i][NUM_TX_BUFFER - 1][LEN_RX_BUFFER - 1]);
                 dev->base_addr   = card->pci_conf;
                 dev->irq         = card->irq;
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ