linux-kernel - Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC5umyjh9fWigbS-xzcwpSyUgA9KkSWkMiSYur3iYWt1_2-vcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:02:10 +0900
From:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To:	Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@....com>
Cc:	"alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com" 
	<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
	"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel

2016-04-18 15:15 GMT+09:00 Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@....com>:
> Hi Akinobu,
>
>
>
> I got an rtc call trace when booting 4.6 kernel on our board and I found it
>
> was caused by this patch:
>
>
>
> commit fc1dcb0b39dbb10d3290f2fcd6e154670f699166
>
> Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
>
> Date:   Mon Mar 7 00:27:53 2016 +0900
>
>
>
>     rtc: ds3232: use rtc->ops_lock to protect alarm operations
>
>
>
>     ds3232->mutex is used to protect for alarm operations which
>
>     need to access status and control registers.
>
>
>
>     But we can use rtc->ops_lock instead.  rtc->ops_lock is held when most
>
>     of rtc_class_ops methods are called, so we only need to explicitly
>
>     acquire it from irq handler in order to protect form concurrent
>
>     accesses.
>
>
>
>     Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com
>
>
>
> The problem is that rtc->ops_lock would be accessed in ds3232_irq()
>
> without being initialized as rtc_device_register() is called too late.

You have already identified the root cause of this issue.

> As I’m not familiar with rtc things, could I just revert the patch or you
> already
>
> have a solution to this problem? Thanks in advance.

Could you check if the problem is resolved by moving the call of
devm_rtc_device_register() from the end of ds3232_probe() to just
before registering irq handler?