[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM2PR04MB0964532D38F8EF2C4F279034E76C0@AM2PR04MB0964.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:36:05 +0000
From: Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@....com>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
CC: "alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com"
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akinobu Mita [mailto:akinobu.mita@...il.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:02 PM
> To: Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@....com>
> Cc: alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>;
> rtc-linux@...glegroups.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel
>
> 2016-04-18 15:15 GMT+09:00 Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@....com>:
> > Hi Akinobu,
> >
> >
> >
> > I got an rtc call trace when booting 4.6 kernel on our board and I
> > found it
> >
> > was caused by this patch:
> >
> >
> >
> > commit fc1dcb0b39dbb10d3290f2fcd6e154670f699166
> >
> > Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
> >
> > Date: Mon Mar 7 00:27:53 2016 +0900
> >
> >
> >
> > rtc: ds3232: use rtc->ops_lock to protect alarm operations
> >
> >
> >
> > ds3232->mutex is used to protect for alarm operations which
> >
> > need to access status and control registers.
> >
> >
> >
> > But we can use rtc->ops_lock instead. rtc->ops_lock is held when
> > most
> >
> > of rtc_class_ops methods are called, so we only need to explicitly
> >
> > acquire it from irq handler in order to protect form concurrent
> >
> > accesses.
> >
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com
> >
> >
> >
> > The problem is that rtc->ops_lock would be accessed in ds3232_irq()
> >
> > without being initialized as rtc_device_register() is called too late.
>
> You have already identified the root cause of this issue.
>
> > As I’m not familiar with rtc things, could I just revert the patch or
> > you already
> >
> > have a solution to this problem? Thanks in advance.
>
> Could you check if the problem is resolved by moving the call of
> devm_rtc_device_register() from the end of ds3232_probe() to just before
> registering irq handler?
Yes. It works(no call trace now).
Regards,
Qianyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists