[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5716009C.8050704@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:25:40 +0530
From: Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: powernv: Ramp-down global pstate slower
than local-pstate
Hi Viresh,
On 04/18/2016 03:48 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15-04-16, 11:58, Akshay Adiga wrote:
>> static int powernv_cpufreq_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> - unsigned long action, void *unused)
>> + unsigned long action, void *unused)
> Unrelated change.. better don't add such changes..
Posting out v3 with out this unrelated change.
>> {
>> int cpu;
>> struct cpufreq_policy cpu_policy;
>> @@ -603,15 +843,18 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_opal_nb = {
>> static void powernv_cpufreq_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> {
>> struct powernv_smp_call_data freq_data;
>> -
>> + struct global_pstate_info *gpstates = policy->driver_data;
> You removed a blank line here and I feel the code looks better with
> that.
>
>> freq_data.pstate_id = powernv_pstate_info.min;
>> + freq_data.gpstate_id = powernv_pstate_info.min;
>> smp_call_function_single(policy->cpu, set_pstate, &freq_data, 1);
>> + del_timer_sync(&gpstates->timer);
>> }
>>
>> static struct cpufreq_driver powernv_cpufreq_driver = {
>> .name = "powernv-cpufreq",
>> .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS,
>> .init = powernv_cpufreq_cpu_init,
>> + .exit = powernv_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
>> .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
>> .target_index = powernv_cpufreq_target_index,
>> .get = powernv_cpufreq_get,
> None of the above comments are mandatory for you to fix..
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
Thanks for Ack :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists