linux-kernel - Re: Runtime warning due to commit 'ARM: OMAP: Catch callers of revision information prior to it being populated' in -next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57162261.4070409@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:19:45 -0500
From:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC:	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Runtime warning due to commit 'ARM: OMAP: Catch callers of
 revision information prior to it being populated' in -next

On 04/18/2016 11:37 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
> 

+ linux-omap, linux-arm

> commit 'ARM: OMAP: Catch callers of revision information prior to it
> being populated' results in a runtime warning on various non-OMAP
> architectures. I have seen it with the following qemu tests.
> 
> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc706
> arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zed
> arm:midway:multi_v7_defconfig:ecx-2000
> arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
> 
> It is also reported by kernelci.org in at least one boot test for imx6q-cm-fx6.

Thanks for the report... :(
> 
> The warning is as follows.
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c:49 omap_rev+0x3c/0x50
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc2-next-20160411 #1
> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
> [<c030f970>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030b094>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c030b094>] (show_stack) from [<c0585424>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xa4)
> [<c0585424>] (dump_stack) from [<c0341774>] (__warn+0xd4/0x100)
> [<c0341774>] (__warn) from [<c03417c0>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x20/0x28)
> [<c03417c0>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0324024>] (omap_rev+0x3c/0x50)
> [<c0324024>] (omap_rev) from [<c1114a18>] (__omap4_sar_ram_init+0x8/0x88)
> [<c1114a18>] (__omap4_sar_ram_init) from [<c0301e5c>] (do_one_initcall+0x3c/0x16c)
> [<c0301e5c>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c1100ccc>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x70/0x1ec)
> [<c1100ccc>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c0b495e4>] (kernel_init+0x8/0x110)
> [<c0b495e4>] (kernel_init) from [<c0307f78>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
> ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]---
> 
> Please have a look.

Tony,
Should we get rid of omap_initcall callers(move them into
board-generic call path or lower the check not to include default of 0?

we have the following users:
> $ git grep omap_".*"_initcall arch/arm/mach-omap2/
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:omap_late_initcall(n8x0_late_initcall);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:omap_subsys_initcall(rx51_video_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c:omap_postcore_initcall(omap3_l3_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c:omap_arch_initcall(omap2_init_devices);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c:omap_postcore_initcall(omap_gpmc_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/dma.c:omap_arch_initcall(omap2_system_dma_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c:omap_postcore_initcall(omap2_gpio_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/hdq1w.c:omap_arch_initcall(omap_init_hdq);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/i2c.c:omap_subsys_initcall(omap_i2c_cmdline);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c:omap_device_initcall(omap_feed_randpool);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c:omap_arch_initcall(omap2_mcbsp_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2-restart.c:omap_postcore_initcall(omap2xxx_common_look_up_clks_for_reset);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c:omap_arch_initcall(omap4_sram_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c:omap_early_initcall(omap4_sar_ram_init);
^^ warning was generated here
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c:omap_postcore_initcall(omap_device_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c:omap_late_initcall_sync(omap_device_late_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c:omap_postcore_initcall(omap_hwmod_setup_all);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_phy_internal.c:omap_early_initcall(omap4430_phy_power_down);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp3xxx_data.c:omap_device_initcall(omap3_opp_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp4xxx_data.c:omap_device_initcall(omap4_opp_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c:omap_arch_initcall(pm_dbg_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c:omap_postcore_initcall(omap2_common_pm_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c:omap_subsys_initcall(omap_init_pmu);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c:omap_postcore_initcall(omap_serial_early_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex-class3.c:omap_late_initcall(sr_class3_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c:omap_arch_initcall(omap2_dm_timer_init);
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/wd_timer.c:omap_subsys_initcall(omap_init_wdt);

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon