[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <571622B7.2010202@schinagl.nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:21:11 +0200
From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Wenkai Du <wenkai.du@...el.com>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through
devicetree
Hey Sergei,
On 19-04-16 12:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 4/19/2016 10:12 AM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>
>> In patch 81f8a7be66 Hans de Goede added a patch to allow marking an mmc
>
> scripts/checkpatch.pl now enforces certain commit citing style, the
> commit summary should be specified too.
I used checkpatch from 4.6.0-rc2(or3) and did not notice it. But I'll
add it to v2.
>
>> device as to having an broken HPI implementation. After talking some
>> with Hans, we now think it is actually the mmc controller that can be
>> broken and not support broken HPI's.
>>
>> This patch adds a new capability, mmc-broken-hpi, which allows us to
>> mark a broken hpi implementation on the host level.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists