[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57164BA9.3040907@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:15:53 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: fix pull-up/down logic
Le 19/04/2016 16:03, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
> The default configuration of a pin is often with a value in the
> pull-up/down field at chip reset. So, even if the internal logic of the
> controller prevents writing a configuration with pull-up and pull-down at
> the same time, we must ensure explicitly this condition before writing the
> register.
>
> This was leading to a pull-down condition not taken into account for
> instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
> Fixes: 776180848b57 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #v4.4 and later
Yes, and I can add:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
and more important:
On a sama5d2 Xplained board:
Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Thanks, bye.
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> index 629b6fe..75093d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> @@ -722,9 +722,11 @@ static int atmel_conf_pin_config_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> break;
> case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> conf |= ATMEL_PIO_PUEN_MASK;
> + conf &= (~ATMEL_PIO_PDEN_MASK);
> break;
> case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> conf |= ATMEL_PIO_PDEN_MASK;
> + conf &= (~ATMEL_PIO_PUEN_MASK);
> break;
> case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
> if (arg == 0)
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists