[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbxu4guLjaaMrQ5h1H=4nByuzbSc-aOBdb2S7m8BfZ5Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:17:08 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91-pio4: fix pull-up/down logic
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Ludovic Desroches
<ludovic.desroches@...el.com> wrote:
> The default configuration of a pin is often with a value in the
> pull-up/down field at chip reset. So, even if the internal logic of the
> controller prevents writing a configuration with pull-up and pull-down at
> the same time, we must ensure explicitly this condition before writing the
> register.
>
> This was leading to a pull-down condition not taken into account for
> instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
> Fixes: 776180848b57 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #v4.4 and later
Patch applied for fixes with the ACKs.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists