[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1694657549.62933.1461084928341.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:55:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-trace-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] tracing: Use pid bitmap instead of a pid array
for set_event_pid
----- On Apr 19, 2016, at 10:34 AM, rostedt rostedt@...dmis.org wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> In order to add the ability to let tasks that are filtered by the events
> have their children also be traced on fork (and then not traced on exit),
> convert the array into a pid bitmask. Most of the time the number of pids is
> only 32768 pids or a 4k bitmask, which is the same size as the default list
> currently is, and that list could grow if more pids are listed.
>
> This also greatly simplifies the code.
The maximum PID number can be increased with sysctl.
See "pid_max" in Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt
What happens when you have a very large pid_max set ?
You say "most of the time" as if this was a fast-path vs a slow-path,
but it is not the case here.
This is a configuration option that can significantly hurt memory usage
in configurations using a large pid_max.
FWIW, I implement a similar feature with a hash table in lttng-modules.
I don't have the child process tracking though, which is a neat improvement.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Suggested-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.h | 5 +-
> kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 221 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> index 3fff4adfd431..68cbb8e10aea 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> @@ -177,9 +177,8 @@ struct trace_options {
> };
>
> struct trace_pid_list {
> - unsigned int nr_pids;
> - int order;
> - pid_t *pids;
> + int pid_max;
> + unsigned long *pids;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> index 598a18675a6b..45f7cc72bf25 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/tracefs.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> -#include <linux/bsearch.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> @@ -471,23 +471,13 @@ static void ftrace_clear_events(struct trace_array *tr)
> mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> }
>
> -static int cmp_pid(const void *key, const void *elt)
> -{
> - const pid_t *search_pid = key;
> - const pid_t *pid = elt;
> -
> - if (*search_pid == *pid)
> - return 0;
> - if (*search_pid < *pid)
> - return -1;
> - return 1;
> -}
> +/* Shouldn't this be in a header? */
> +extern int pid_max;
>
> static bool
> ignore_this_task(struct trace_pid_list *filtered_pids, struct task_struct *task)
> {
> - pid_t search_pid;
> - pid_t *pid;
> + pid_t pid;
>
> /*
> * Return false, because if filtered_pids does not exist,
> @@ -496,15 +486,16 @@ ignore_this_task(struct trace_pid_list *filtered_pids,
> struct task_struct *task)
> if (!filtered_pids)
> return false;
>
> - search_pid = task->pid;
> + pid = task->pid;
>
> - pid = bsearch(&search_pid, filtered_pids->pids,
> - filtered_pids->nr_pids, sizeof(pid_t),
> - cmp_pid);
> - if (!pid)
> + /*
> + * If pid_max changed after filtered_pids was created, we
> + * by default ignore all pids greater than the previous pid_max.
> + */
> + if (task->pid >= filtered_pids->pid_max)
> return true;
>
> - return false;
> + return !test_bit(task->pid, filtered_pids->pids);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -602,7 +593,7 @@ static void __ftrace_clear_event_pids(struct trace_array
> *tr)
> /* Wait till all users are no longer using pid filtering */
> synchronize_sched();
>
> - free_pages((unsigned long)pid_list->pids, pid_list->order);
> + vfree(pid_list->pids);
> kfree(pid_list);
> }
>
> @@ -946,11 +937,32 @@ static void t_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> }
>
> +static void *
> +p_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + struct trace_array *tr = m->private;
> + struct trace_pid_list *pid_list = rcu_dereference_sched(tr->filtered_pids);
> + unsigned long pid = (unsigned long)v;
> +
> + (*pos)++;
> +
> + /* pid already is +1 of the actual prevous bit */
> + pid = find_next_bit(pid_list->pids, pid_list->pid_max, pid);
> +
> + /* Return pid + 1 to allow zero to be represented */
> + if (pid < pid_list->pid_max)
> + return (void *)(pid + 1);
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static void *p_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> __acquires(RCU)
> {
> struct trace_pid_list *pid_list;
> struct trace_array *tr = m->private;
> + unsigned long pid;
> + loff_t l = 0;
>
> /*
> * Grab the mutex, to keep calls to p_next() having the same
> @@ -963,10 +975,18 @@ static void *p_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>
> pid_list = rcu_dereference_sched(tr->filtered_pids);
>
> - if (!pid_list || *pos >= pid_list->nr_pids)
> + if (!pid_list)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pid = find_first_bit(pid_list->pids, pid_list->pid_max);
> + if (pid >= pid_list->pid_max)
> return NULL;
>
> - return (void *)&pid_list->pids[*pos];
> + /* Return pid + 1 so that zero can be the exit value */
> + for (pid++; pid && l < *pos;
> + pid = (unsigned long)p_next(m, (void *)pid, &l))
> + ;
> + return (void *)pid;
> }
>
> static void p_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> @@ -976,25 +996,11 @@ static void p_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> }
>
> -static void *
> -p_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> -{
> - struct trace_array *tr = m->private;
> - struct trace_pid_list *pid_list = rcu_dereference_sched(tr->filtered_pids);
> -
> - (*pos)++;
> -
> - if (*pos >= pid_list->nr_pids)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - return (void *)&pid_list->pids[*pos];
> -}
> -
> static int p_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> - pid_t *pid = v;
> + unsigned long pid = (unsigned long)v - 1;
>
> - seq_printf(m, "%d\n", *pid);
> + seq_printf(m, "%lu\n", pid);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1543,11 +1549,6 @@ show_header(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, size_t
> cnt, loff_t *ppos)
> return r;
> }
>
> -static int max_pids(struct trace_pid_list *pid_list)
> -{
> - return (PAGE_SIZE << pid_list->order) / sizeof(pid_t);
> -}
> -
> static void ignore_task_cpu(void *data)
> {
> struct trace_array *tr = data;
> @@ -1571,7 +1572,7 @@ ftrace_event_pid_write(struct file *filp, const char
> __user *ubuf,
> struct seq_file *m = filp->private_data;
> struct trace_array *tr = m->private;
> struct trace_pid_list *filtered_pids = NULL;
> - struct trace_pid_list *pid_list = NULL;
> + struct trace_pid_list *pid_list;
> struct trace_event_file *file;
> struct trace_parser parser;
> unsigned long val;
> @@ -1579,7 +1580,7 @@ ftrace_event_pid_write(struct file *filp, const char
> __user *ubuf,
> ssize_t read = 0;
> ssize_t ret = 0;
> pid_t pid;
> - int i;
> + int nr_pids = 0;
>
> if (!cnt)
> return 0;
> @@ -1592,10 +1593,43 @@ ftrace_event_pid_write(struct file *filp, const char
> __user *ubuf,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> + filtered_pids = rcu_dereference_protected(tr->filtered_pids,
> + lockdep_is_held(&event_mutex));
> +
> /*
> - * Load as many pids into the array before doing a
> - * swap from the tr->filtered_pids to the new list.
> + * Always recreate a new array. The write is an all or nothing
> + * operation. Always create a new array when adding new pids by
> + * the user. If the operation fails, then the current list is
> + * not modified.
> */
> + pid_list = kmalloc(sizeof(*pid_list), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pid_list) {
> + read = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + pid_list->pid_max = READ_ONCE(pid_max);
> + /* Only truncating will shrink pid_max */
> + if (filtered_pids && filtered_pids->pid_max > pid_list->pid_max)
> + pid_list->pid_max = filtered_pids->pid_max;
> + pid_list->pids = vzalloc((pid_list->pid_max + 7) >> 3);
> + if (!pid_list->pids) {
> + kfree(pid_list);
> + read = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (filtered_pids) {
> + /* copy the current bits to the new max */
> + pid = find_first_bit(filtered_pids->pids,
> + filtered_pids->pid_max);
> + while (pid < filtered_pids->pid_max) {
> + set_bit(pid, pid_list->pids);
> + pid = find_next_bit(filtered_pids->pids,
> + filtered_pids->pid_max,
> + pid + 1);
> + nr_pids++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> while (cnt > 0) {
>
> this_pos = 0;
> @@ -1613,92 +1647,35 @@ ftrace_event_pid_write(struct file *filp, const char
> __user *ubuf,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> if (kstrtoul(parser.buffer, 0, &val))
> break;
> - if (val > INT_MAX)
> + if (val >= pid_list->pid_max)
> break;
>
> pid = (pid_t)val;
>
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - if (!pid_list) {
> - pid_list = kmalloc(sizeof(*pid_list), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pid_list)
> - break;
> -
> - filtered_pids = rcu_dereference_protected(tr->filtered_pids,
> - lockdep_is_held(&event_mutex));
> - if (filtered_pids)
> - pid_list->order = filtered_pids->order;
> - else
> - pid_list->order = 0;
> -
> - pid_list->pids = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL,
> - pid_list->order);
> - if (!pid_list->pids)
> - break;
> -
> - if (filtered_pids) {
> - pid_list->nr_pids = filtered_pids->nr_pids;
> - memcpy(pid_list->pids, filtered_pids->pids,
> - pid_list->nr_pids * sizeof(pid_t));
> - } else
> - pid_list->nr_pids = 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (pid_list->nr_pids >= max_pids(pid_list)) {
> - pid_t *pid_page;
> -
> - pid_page = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL,
> - pid_list->order + 1);
> - if (!pid_page)
> - break;
> - memcpy(pid_page, pid_list->pids,
> - pid_list->nr_pids * sizeof(pid_t));
> - free_pages((unsigned long)pid_list->pids, pid_list->order);
> -
> - pid_list->order++;
> - pid_list->pids = pid_page;
> - }
> + set_bit(pid, pid_list->pids);
> + nr_pids++;
>
> - pid_list->pids[pid_list->nr_pids++] = pid;
> trace_parser_clear(&parser);
> ret = 0;
> }
> trace_parser_put(&parser);
>
> if (ret < 0) {
> - if (pid_list)
> - free_pages((unsigned long)pid_list->pids, pid_list->order);
> + vfree(pid_list->pids);
> kfree(pid_list);
> - mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - if (!pid_list) {
> - mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> - return ret;
> + read = ret;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - sort(pid_list->pids, pid_list->nr_pids, sizeof(pid_t), cmp_pid, NULL);
> -
> - /* Remove duplicates */
> - for (i = 1; i < pid_list->nr_pids; i++) {
> - int start = i;
> -
> - while (i < pid_list->nr_pids &&
> - pid_list->pids[i - 1] == pid_list->pids[i])
> - i++;
> -
> - if (start != i) {
> - if (i < pid_list->nr_pids) {
> - memmove(&pid_list->pids[start], &pid_list->pids[i],
> - (pid_list->nr_pids - i) * sizeof(pid_t));
> - pid_list->nr_pids -= i - start;
> - i = start;
> - } else
> - pid_list->nr_pids = start;
> - }
> + if (!nr_pids) {
> + /* Cleared the list of pids */
> + vfree(pid_list->pids);
> + kfree(pid_list);
> + read = ret;
> + if (!filtered_pids)
> + goto out;
> + pid_list = NULL;
> }
> -
> rcu_assign_pointer(tr->filtered_pids, pid_list);
>
> list_for_each_entry(file, &tr->events, list) {
> @@ -1708,7 +1685,7 @@ ftrace_event_pid_write(struct file *filp, const char
> __user *ubuf,
> if (filtered_pids) {
> synchronize_sched();
>
> - free_pages((unsigned long)filtered_pids->pids, filtered_pids->order);
> + vfree(filtered_pids->pids);
> kfree(filtered_pids);
> } else {
> /*
> @@ -1745,10 +1722,12 @@ ftrace_event_pid_write(struct file *filp, const char
> __user *ubuf,
> */
> on_each_cpu(ignore_task_cpu, tr, 1);
>
> + out:
> mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
>
> ret = read;
> - *ppos += read;
> + if (read > 0)
> + *ppos += read;
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists