linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (waketorture.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160419165606.GB3837@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:56:06 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (waketorture.c)

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20160418:
> > 
> 
> on x86_64:
> 
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `wake_torture_stats_print':
> waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f06d): undefined reference to `trace_clock_global'
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `wake_torture_waiter':
> waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f196): undefined reference to `trace_clock_local'
> waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f1bc): undefined reference to `trace_clock_local'
> waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f1d4): undefined reference to `trace_clock_local'
> waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f237): undefined reference to `trace_clock_local'
> waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f253): undefined reference to `trace_clock_local'
> kernel/built-in.o:waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f318): more undefined references to `trace_clock_local' follow
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `wake_torture_init':
> waketorture.c:(.init.text+0x2b3f): undefined reference to `trace_clock_global'
> 
> 
> Full randconfig file is attached.

I don't see the .config, could you please send it to me?

Looks like I need to add a few "depends" or "selects" clauses...

							Thanx, Paul