[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160420042340.GD3472@linux-uzut.site>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:23:40 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using
clear_bit_unlock()
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>>... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics,
>>therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls.
>
>Hello Davidlohr,
>
>Are you sure that this patch has been sent to the right person? I have
>helped to review a change in this code but I'm not the maintainer of
>this code.
Ah, adding Andrew and Ingo, not sure who is responsible for these bits.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists