[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160420131633.GI2527@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:16:33 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Anju T <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jolsa@...hat.com, dsahern@...il.com,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
acme@...nel.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 0/4]perf/powerpc: Add ability to sample intr machine
state in powerpc
Em Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:55:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 00:57 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Anju T escreveu:
> > > On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote:
> > > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Build | 1 +
> > > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++
> > > > tools/perf/config/Makefile | 5 ++
> > > > create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> > > > create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> > > Can this be taken into the next tree?
> > Even the bits in tools/perf/ are arch specific, so I guess this goes via
> > the powerpc tree? Michael?
> Yeah if that's OK with you.
>
> It doesn't look like it will generate much in the way of merge conflicts.
>
> Do you want to send an ack?
For the tools/perf/ bits:
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists