linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c: s3c2410: Minor function-level comment cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:59:52 -0400
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c: s3c2410: Minor function-level comment cleanup

Hello Krzysztof,

On 04/20/2016 05:24 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Cleanup the weird function-level comments and remove obvious
> documentatoin for probe/remove.
>

s/documentatoin/documentation
 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> ---

I wonder if instead we should change to kernel-doc formatted documentation.

All the functions are static so kernel-doc is not really required but still
Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt says that is suggested for source
code layout consistency.

But I agree that's either kernel-doc format or minimal as your patch does:

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America