linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160420144545.GE5995@atomide.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:45:45 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, javier@...hile0.org, fcooper@...com,
	nsekhar@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND
 on non-OMAP platforms

* Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> [160419 13:13]:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:46:19 +0300
> Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > After all the changes we discussed in [1] I was able to test nand/next-with-gpmc-rework
> > and it worked fine.
> > 
> > [1] - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi/22596/focus=22936
> > 
> > I'd be happy to test the branch again after you've incorporated all changes.
> 
> Just pushed what's supposed to be my new nand/next into
> nand/next-with-gpmc-rework, can you test it? I'll push it to nand/next
> once I have your confirmation that everything is good.

Looks good to me too, merges fine with my for-next and still
works for me.

Thanks,

Tony