linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <571744AF.5030008@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:58:23 +0300
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, <javier@...hile0.org>,
	<fcooper@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>,
	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<computersforpeace@...il.com>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	<ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND
 on non-OMAP platforms

On 19/04/16 23:11, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:46:19 +0300
> Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> After all the changes we discussed in [1] I was able to test nand/next-with-gpmc-rework
>> and it worked fine.
>>
>> [1] - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi/22596/focus=22936
>>
>> I'd be happy to test the branch again after you've incorporated all changes.
> 
> Just pushed what's supposed to be my new nand/next into
> nand/next-with-gpmc-rework, can you test it? I'll push it to nand/next
> once I have your confirmation that everything is good.
> 

Tested this on dra7-evm, am437x-gp-evm and omap3-beagle and all seems good. Thanks :).

cheers,
-roger