[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160420213637.GA4978@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:36:37 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:06:33PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Setting ret to sem doesn't make any sense. Just use "=a" and "a".
Yeah, that's what Michal's patch ontop does.
And to answer my own question: we need the "a" (sem) input for the fast
path.
I guess we can still move "1" (RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) before the asm():
long tmp = RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS;
One thing I'm still not clear on is why we need the output tmp operand:
"=d" (tmp) ?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists